[gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 20:45:24 +0100
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 03:35:56 -0400, Bill Gardner wrote:
> In any case, I see our difference of opinion stemming from the fact that
> you want to see connections succeed (when possible), whereas I'm quite
> happy if they fail :-)
Hm... I think there are times when its perfectly valid to leave some
connections of a set unconnected, eg. you might have one source feding
some of the inputs of a higher order soundfield, eg. stereo feeding 5.1,
which is later mixed with a true 5.1 source.
One thing that (I dont think) has been touched on is wether plugins should
be able to tell if some of its inputs are left unconnected, and wether the
plugin should get a buffer of 0.0's on that input, or NULL (or
requivalent).
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
