[gmpi] Re: Time Summary (was *Ping*)
- From: "Vincent Burel" <vincent.burel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 20:08:16 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: "B.J. Buchalter" <bj@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 7:10 PM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: Time Summary (was *Ping*)
>I have no problem with the events
> being in timeslice long chunks, nor do I have a problem with getting them
> ceil(delay/timeslice) timeslices early. I just want them early enough that
> the timestamp is still valid when I receive it at the remote device. I
think
> that what you propose I am saying is probably too complicated for hosts
> which will be processing events in blocks.
Yes... the more i follow the discussion about timestamped event and the more
i'm convinced that this concept makes no sens on a full real time
audiosystem.
and "Too complicated for the host" is an euphemism i'm affraid ! :-)
Vincent Burel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
