[gmpi] Re: Time Summary (was *Ping*)
- From: "Vincent Burel" <vincent.burel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 18:48:58 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Davis" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2003 6:22 PM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: Time Summary (was *Ping*)
> >> Imagine you have relatively large buffers (30 ms or more). Realtime
events
> >> can happen while a timeslice is being processed. If the buffer is even
> >> larger, the user could reasonably click new events into the sequence
while
> >> the event's (scheduled) timeslice is running. In this case, can you
> >actually
> >> schedule the event with sample accuracy in the current pass through the
> >> graph?
> >
> >within the 30ms you don't know when and in how many time your buffer will
be
> >processed. This could happend at the ms number 5 during 15 ms, this can
> >happend at the ms number 1 and takes only 1micro second. And in this case
,
> >sending new event incoming at ms number 20 won't be processed because
it's
> >simply already done !
>
> hurrah! vincent and i agree on something! break out the champagne!
> (though i'd probably prefer a bottle of vouvray :)
i guess someone paid you for that ! :-)
however , here it is not the time for Champagn or Vouvray, but for Ricard or
Martini.
A la votre et bon apéro !
Vincent Burel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
