[gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.8
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:39:26 -0800
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 12:36:07AM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 12:28:59PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > 2) some plugins prefer integer IO. Specifically TDM. Do we want to make
> > accords for them? Will they ever USE GMPI? Does it benefit anyone else? I
> > don't see Digi switching. I don't know if it benefits anyone else. I DO
> > know that implementing the infrastructure I desribed (or something like it)
> > allows us to add double support or any other IO type we want (FFT?)
>
> Not really, FFT, like fixedpoint has many, many parameters, eg. power,
> width, overlap, window shape, data format...
>
> You could do soemthing like I described for non-native processing, but the
> chances of the receiver being compatible with your choice of parameters is
> slim.
Well, we COULD do FFTW IO. (outside GMPI) Define an FFTW buffer format for
inter-plug IO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
