[gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 8.3

  • From: Mike Berry <mberry@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 17:12:32 -0600



Tim Hockin wrote:

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 05:00:29PM -0600, Mike Berry wrote:

Agreed, but I also think that int should be collapsed into one floating
point type, I feel there is some extra simplicity from handling integer
values as a hinted float type, eg. automation, interpolation etc. I dont
have any religious convition about it though :)


The collapse has a fundamental problem, which is that the range of the int is larger than the range of the float. What I mean by this is that 0x7FFFFFFF can be represented exactly by a 32 bit int, but cannot be represented exactly by a 32 bit float. So the use of floats for ints only works if the mantissa of the float is >= in size to the int. So doubles would work for 32 bit ints, but not 64 bit one. I think that we still need an int type.


Devils' advocate: round or use floor() or something faster (for x86 there is
a fast cast lib that works well) .  If you use floats to represent ints, you
don't need to be exact.

Tim

If we eliminate ints as a possible data type, as suggested, then everyone has no choice but to use floats and incur the problems they entail.


--
Mike Berry
Adobe Systems


---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: