[gmpi] Re: 3.12 Control I/O
- From: "Koen Tanghe" <koen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 01:55:51 +0200
On Tuesday, May 18, 2004 8:27 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Steve Harris <xxxS.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 08:38:00 -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
>> If all controls were normalized... It makes this problem easier but
>> other things harder. We decided early on that we want the ability to
>> have natural ranges. Do we want to change that?
>
> I dont. Natural ranges have a number of benfits, including increased
> compatability between plugins.
>
> e.g. if you have an envelope follower and you replace it with another with
> hte same parameters, but different min/max values you will be able to move
> across without trying to do paramter conversion.
I agree.
And it's easier for debugging (but that's not important) ;-)
Koen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
