From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: rotation
To: "geocentrism list" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, October 13, 2008, 8:27 PM
Allen I am going to take your analysis a step at a time.. I cannot follow your words but this pic says something.
Here it is again with my comment.
Your boxworld is absolutely not the true illustration of the world in translation around the sun.
If you had tilted the box so that the green side was pointing as shown in the bottom box of your diagram, to show the earth tilt, then you would have to keep the green side always tilted, and always pointing in the same direction. Instead you have the green side rotating to face the sun throughout. This does not happen. Regner explained it last year.
Do you get what I am saying.
Now I take it fairly that your little camera is on a wheel pivoted to be free to spin on its axis as the world translates anually, and spins daily. ...
First of all we can think about what happens to it as the world does its daily rotation.. Paul and everybody else already have demonstrated this. But I think we should stumble over this part first, and do it again....
Because, if you alter the diagram above as I have indicated is the true translation of the world annually, there will be no annual rotation of the world, and so the camera will not experience any observed rotation at all. But the sun will see a different part of the earths surface over one year. Ignore and remove the daily rotation, the world looking down from above will appear to rotate one rev per annum with respect to the sun. and from an earth observer the sun will appear to make one annual orbit around the world in 12 months.
But lets get back to the daily rotation effect. We must assume and try for a total frictionless bearing on the camera supporting wheel..
This attained, then a camera on a disc facing axially North at the equator will not be rotated by the earths alleged movement....An observer at the same location will see the camera make one complete revolution in 24 hours.. Like I say, thats if the world is spinning. You can demonstrate this by spinning gently with a cup of water and a floating object in your hand...
However getting a wheel with sufficient mass, and with zero bearing friction would be hard for you and me....But I like it, and it has a different relationship to the aether , to make this worth my further investigation.
A valid objection based upon my aether inertia theory. described in another post,
Looking at diagram called "aether attachment" representing earth from the North looking at floating camera orange disc. If the world is rotating towards the east against any aether field the angular approach and cutting of the aether field will cause the inertia effect which will make the disc keep its orientation and thus to an observer it will not turn.. We cannot say ha! the earthis stationary... Look at my diagram where I have aether force field radiating out from a centre..of the earth... and I show this aether rotating to the west.. The relationship of angular cutting of the aether field is the same and the disc will not turn... So we once again are stalemated.
I am now proceeding to your other diagrams..
Phil
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 4:05 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] rotation
|
First: this is how we create a box the will translate around the sun in earths supposed orbit
Second: we can fix a satilite so that it looks at the NCP but freefloating such that any real rotation must manifest itself on that axis...Phil, this is absolutly true because, otherwise the Grav probe B experiment would have failed as well... only the box will translate with the earth since it is fixed to the earth via ground stations. However, the freefloating satilite is only fixed wrt the box on two of its axis..the third axis which runs along the NCP free floats ...it will not translate it must roatate if the earth and the box have any kind of orbit tanslation or not. This is true because there is nothing to "lock" the satilite in a translation around the sun, it free floats in the same way the spining part of a gyroscope would freefloats. Remember, the background stars do not move wrt the NCP/axis or in a GU they rotate into the same exact position every 23h56m4s thus a net
motion of 0 around the NCP.
|
--- On Sat, 10/11/08, Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] David Icke audio - with hour 2
To: "Geocentrism/RealityReviewed" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, October 11, 2008, 3:12 PM
. . . you've got Mainstream Science which is broken up into endless disciplines that hardly any of which talk to each other. So even Mainstream Science has got many, many, many of these dots. What it doesn't do is connect them, and systematically science is discouraged from connecting them because once they're connected suddenly we start to see a completely different picture of the life we are experiencing, and who we are. And it's become clear to me that we live in the equivalent of, obviously a much more advanced version of the wireless internet . . . David Icke more HERE.
--------------------------------------------------------
EXPANSION
FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2008
MP3 Files: Hour 1, Hour 2
Playlist Files: PLS M3U
"Opting Out of the Matrix" with David Icke
Much-loved author, speaker and connector-of-dots David Icke plumbs consciousness and its limitations and possibilities in this seminal interview on breaking out of the "mind prison" of physical reality. We personally and constantly edit what we perceive of the world we're in because we are programmed since
birth to limit our experience. Icke tells us society is structured to entrap people in the left brain by hypnotists who work in and run the institutions created for us all! If only we could step beyond the program and begin to observe ourselves in reality, rather than mechanically continuing to participate in the very narrow band of experience we have self-selected. "Choose to love" and you turn off the manipulation and control -- it's that simple, and it's your choice. |
----------------------------------------------------------------- | |
