[geocentrism] Re: Regner concedes?
- From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 13:52:51 +0000 (GMT)
Jack L
Yes -- me again!
I don't know if anyone has kept count but my recollection is that the total
count of formal points proposed by all parties can't exceed about a dozen and I
think it's less. eg Jack, I don't recall a single point from you. Am I correct?
Paul D
----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, 9 November, 2007 1:24:11 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Regner concedes?
Dear Philip,
I think Robert has a very valid point regarding Regner's available time. I do
not think that we should jump to Regner's tune to the nth degree. It doesn't
matter if he declines further on the lack of Robert's remaining 4 points there
are plenty of others who can take his place. We don't owe him anything. Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: philip madsen
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 11:23 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Regner concedes?
Its nice to know that Regner is still on board.
Jack
Ye of little faith.... and many guilty of presumption attributing to another
only what was imagined, as though it were fact..
Regner will have no problems to meet so far.. Robert S please get your 4
others in to the pot.... This is all that we is waiting for.....
Phil
National Bingo Night. Play along for the chance to win $10,000 every week.
Download your gamecard now at Yahoo!7 TV.
http://au.blogs.yahoo.com/national-bingo-night/
Other related posts:
