[geocentrism] Re: Proof of Heliocentric Incorrectness and Deception
- From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 18:34:20 +0000 (GMT)
Bernie B
A few questions in teal inserted below.
Proof of Heliocentric Incorrectness and Deception
1. If you get onto a helicopter on the east coast of the USA, lift off
vertically and hover above the ground for four hours, then set down on the
ground again, you will be in the same location that you lifted off from. If the
Earth were rotating then the helicopter should have set down on the west coast
of the USA. If the Earth is rotating, say 1000mph surface velocity, then the
atmosphere and the helicopter which is in contact with it, would also be moving
at 1000mph. What mechanism do you propose which would slow the helicopter to
0mph and successfully battle the 1000mph winds which it would encounter? (It
would also have to accelerate back to 1000mph to land of course). Therefore the
Earth is not rotating.
2. If the Earth were hurtling through space to orbit the sun at a velocity of
66,600 ( six,six,six ) miles per hour (107,182 (one, zero, seven, one, eight,
two) kilometres per hour) then the Earth's atmosphere would be left behind like
a comet's tail. Why would it be left behind?
3. On a clear, calm and sunny day we can go outside and see, feel and observe
that it is the sun that is moving and orbiting the Earth and not the Earth
orbiting the sun. One can see, feel and sense no movement of the Earth but one
can see, feel and sense only stillness. This observation and experiment is
scientific. A bit like the way you can see feel and sense no movement in a jet
liner at 35,000ft altitude in still air and travelling at 600mph?
4. The heliocentric idea is primarily a game of deception so we must be aware
of tricks that are likely to take place. They will lie and change the subject
to information that they control and is unfalsifiable. For instance changing
the subject and focusing the discussion on an object ( satellite ) that is
22,000 miles away. When we see people floating in space they will say that they
are really falling towards (around) the Earth. They will say that the thrusters
on "geosynchronous" satellites are only used for horizontal and not vertical
positioning. How much fuel do you estimate would be needed to keep a 2500kg
satellite from falling for a period of 10-12 years?[1] Most people who believe
the truth of geocentrism are unaware and would not even consider the fact that
others would deliberately put huge efforts into deceiving them. It is easy to
fool people who are gullible and think others would never have an evil agenda
and lie to them.
I ask these questions in the knowledge that geocentrists have adequately
explained these points to you recently, and thus I wonder at your persistance
in these matters.
Paul D
[1] http://www.isro.org/gslv.htm
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
Other related posts:
