Dr. Regner,
Recently, my colleague and I, Dr. Robert Bennett (Ph.D. in Physics, with
an
emphasis on General Relativity), wrote a book (about 1,000 pages) titled:
"Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right." I myself was a physics major
in
colleage, but my Ph.D. is in religious studies, so I am able to
understand
and write about both the scientific and historical aspect of this issue,
while Dr. Bennett compliments?the technical side of the issue.
Interestingly enough, prior to his signing on as a co-author of GWW, Dr.
Bennett was coaxed by a few of our mutual colleagues into trying to
persuade
me against delving into geocentrism, much less writing a book about
it.?To
his utter dismay, after seeing the scientific evidence, he was thoroughly
persuaded that geocentrism had more than enough merit to become the
perferred
model of cosmology, and this is a man who taught heliocentrism and
General
Relativity for 30 years.
As for the book Volume I, which has 650 pages, contains all the
scientific
evidence for geocentrism. Volume II, which has 400 pages, contains all
the
historical evidence for geocentrism.
What we could do in addition to or in lieu of this discussion, is send
you a
complimentary copy of Volume I. This way, you could see all the
arguments,
many of which you would appreciate because of your astronomy
background.?We
dig real deep into the scientific evidence, so perpare yourself for an
exceptional ride, one that I'm sure you've never had in your whole
career.
If you oblige, just send me your Denmark address and I will see that a
copy
is?sent to you immediately. We also have a CDrom with 30 different
cosmological animations on it so that you can see the models in graphic
form.
I will send that as well.
Looking forward to?your reply.
Robert A. Sungenis
-----Original Message-----
From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:12 am
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: squabbles.
Sifting through 28 postings with the heading
"Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts?"
I found only one entry to add to the list!
If this is the best you can do, I don't think
geocentricity has much of a future, and I would
have to conclude that I waisted my time. Please
prove me wrong.
Regards,
Regner
Quoting Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Thanks, Philip
>
> - Regner
>
> Quoting philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > All, perhaps it might help in this period if one changed the subject
line
> > when squabbling about something, and reserving the main theme subject
> > ,
> >
> > "Is geocentrism supported by the facts" for nothing other than the 5
> > responses Regner requested.
> >
> > Meantime Steven, this thunderbird email client which filters the mail
into
> > slots, interests me very much. Can you tell me more about how to get
> > it.
> >
> > Regner did not specifically ask for geocentric supporting facts. His
> actual
> > words were,
> >
> > "I would like to start this discussion by asking you to state the
> > 5 most fundamental reasons that your theory is correct. "
> >
> > Pauls theory, and mine differ from Allens. They will all go into the
> melting
> > pot of Regners summary for discussion, thats if any sort of coherent
> > consensus for geocentrism emerges. So far not so good.
> >
> > Philip.
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! -
http://mail.aol.com
