[geocentrism] Dr. Regner: An invitation to you
- From: sungenis@xxxxxxx
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:58:46 -0400
Dr. Regner,
Recently, my colleague and I, Dr. Robert Bennett (Ph.D. in Physics, with an
emphasis on General Relativity), wrote a book (about 1,000 pages) titled:
"Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right." I myself was a physics major in
colleage, but my Ph.D. is in religious studies, so I am able to understand and
write about both the scientific and historical aspect of this issue, while Dr.
Bennett compliments?the technical side of the issue.
Interestingly enough, prior to his signing on as a co-author of GWW, Dr.
Bennett was coaxed by a few of our mutual colleagues into trying to persuade me
against delving into geocentrism, much less writing a book about it.?To his
utter dismay, after seeing the scientific evidence, he was thoroughly persuaded
that geocentrism had more than enough merit to become the perferred model of
cosmology, and this is a man who taught heliocentrism and General Relativity
for 30 years.
As for the book Volume I, which has 650 pages, contains all the scientific
evidence for geocentrism. Volume II, which has 400 pages, contains all the
historical evidence for geocentrism.
What we could do in addition to or in lieu of this discussion, is send you a
complimentary copy of Volume I. This way, you could see all the arguments, many
of which you would appreciate because of your astronomy background.?We dig real
deep into the scientific evidence, so perpare yourself for an exceptional ride,
one that I'm sure you've never had in your whole career.
If you oblige, just send me your Denmark address and I will see that a copy
is?sent to you immediately. We also have a CDrom with 30 different cosmological
animations on it so that you can see the models in graphic form. I will send
that as well.
Looking forward to?your reply.
Robert A. Sungenis
-----Original Message-----
From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:12 am
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: squabbles.
Sifting through 28 postings with the heading
"Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts?"
I found only one entry to add to the list!
If this is the best you can do, I don't think
geocentricity has much of a future, and I would
have to conclude that I waisted my time. Please
prove me wrong.
Regards,
Regner
Quoting Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Thanks, Philip
>
> - Regner
>
> Quoting philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > All, perhaps it might help in this period if one changed the subject line
> > when squabbling about something, and reserving the main theme subject ,
> >
> > "Is geocentrism supported by the facts" for nothing other than the 5
> > responses Regner requested.
> >
> > Meantime Steven, this thunderbird email client which filters the mail into
> > slots, interests me very much. Can you tell me more about how to get it.
> >
> > Regner did not specifically ask for geocentric supporting facts. His
> actual
> > words were,
> >
> > "I would like to start this discussion by asking you to state the
> > 5 most fundamental reasons that your theory is correct. "
> >
> > Pauls theory, and mine differ from Allens. They will all go into the
> melting
> > pot of Regners summary for discussion, thats if any sort of coherent
> > consensus for geocentrism emerges. So far not so good.
> >
> > Philip.
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! -
http://mail.aol.com
Other related posts:
