[geocentrism] Re: Dr. Regner: An invitation to you
- From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
My view,
Since it's Neville's and son Steven's website and discussion forum
we should be encouraging people to read www.geocentricuniverse.com
There is enough quality information there from the world's expert
on Geocentrism to generate a comprehensive and complete debate
in the present time period.
Also we should wait for Neville to get back from his safari
(
http://www.aldridge-animation.co.uk/images/darkride/safari/thumbnails/hunter.jpg
)
in India so he can read and comment on postings so far, because he is
the moderator/owner of this discussion forum, and notwithstanding
the fact that a wrapping-up of this debate without his expert participation
would be much less productive.
Kind Regards,
Bernie
Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for the offer, but that would be a wasted effort.
Throwing money at a thousand pages of books or converting any number
of people does not make your theory correct. I have read enough on
earthdeception.googlepages.com and www.geocentricuniverse.com
to know what is going on, and there has been nothing to convince me
on either web-site. Reading more of the same kind will by no means
change my mind.
IF we could finally get this discussion going, you might be able to
convince me that your theory is physically viable and then I would
certainly reconsider your offer.
The first part of the discussion is for all of you to give me five
facts or observation that are the most supportive of your theory.
The next part is the discussion of each of those five fact. This is
where I am giving you a chance to convince me - not now. Using figures
from your books would be a very good idea for that second part of our
discussion - and it would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Regner Trampedach
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Quoting sungenis@xxxxxxx:
> Dr. Regner,
>
> Recently, my colleague and I, Dr. Robert Bennett (Ph.D. in Physics, with an
> emphasis on General Relativity), wrote a book (about 1,000 pages) titled:
> "Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right." I myself was a physics major in
> colleage, but my Ph.D. is in religious studies, so I am able to understand
> and write about both the scientific and historical aspect of this issue,
> while Dr. Bennett compliments?the technical side of the issue.
>
> Interestingly enough, prior to his signing on as a co-author of GWW, Dr.
> Bennett was coaxed by a few of our mutual colleagues into trying to persuade
> me against delving into geocentrism, much less writing a book about it.?To
> his utter dismay, after seeing the scientific evidence, he was thoroughly
> persuaded that geocentrism had more than enough merit to become the perferred
> model of cosmology, and this is a man who taught heliocentrism and General
> Relativity for 30 years.
>
> As for the book Volume I, which has 650 pages, contains all the scientific
> evidence for geocentrism. Volume II, which has 400 pages, contains all the
> historical evidence for geocentrism.
>
> What we could do in addition to or in lieu of this discussion, is send you a
> complimentary copy of Volume I. This way, you could see all the arguments,
> many of which you would appreciate because of your astronomy background.?We
> dig real deep into the scientific evidence, so perpare yourself for an
> exceptional ride, one that I'm sure you've never had in your whole career.
>
> If you oblige, just send me your Denmark address and I will see that a copy
> is?sent to you immediately. We also have a CDrom with 30 different
> cosmological animations on it so that you can see the models in graphic form.
> I will send that as well.
>
> Looking forward to?your reply.
>
> Robert A. Sungenis
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Regner Trampedach
> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:12 am
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: squabbles.
>
>
>
> Sifting through 28 postings with the heading
> "Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts?"
> I found only one entry to add to the list!
> If this is the best you can do, I don't think
> geocentricity has much of a future, and I would
> have to conclude that I waisted my time. Please
> prove me wrong.
>
> Regards,
>
> Regner
>
> Quoting Regner Trampedach :
>
> > Thanks, Philip
> >
> > - Regner
> >
> > Quoting philip madsen
:
> >
> > > All, perhaps it might help in this period if one changed the subject
> line
> > > when squabbling about something, and reserving the main theme subject ,
> > >
> > > "Is geocentrism supported by the facts" for nothing other than the 5
> > > responses Regner requested.
> > >
> > > Meantime Steven, this thunderbird email client which filters the mail
> into
> > > slots, interests me very much. Can you tell me more about how to get it.
> > >
> > > Regner did not specifically ask for geocentric supporting facts. His
> > actual
> > > words were,
> > >
> > > "I would like to start this discussion by asking you to state the
> > > 5 most fundamental reasons that your theory is correct. "
> > >
> > > Pauls theory, and mine differ from Allens. They will all go into the
> > melting
> > > pot of Regners summary for discussion, thats if any sort of coherent
> > > consensus for geocentrism emerges. So far not so good.
> > >
> > > Philip.
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! -
> http://mail.aol.com
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Other related posts:
