Newcomers to
the forum might like to read this basic introduction to the mainstream view of
geocentrism, since it is a fine example of the shallowness that most
commentators exhibit regarding some of the issues
involved.
Neville
Quite so Neville. When he resorts to this,
"Now what about
the proposition that the earth is the unmoving centre of the universe? Well,
GR states that the effect of a force resisting gravity and the effect of
a force accelerating a reference frame are identical and indistinguishable. In
GR, spacetime geometry is determined by the distribution of matter/energy
in the universe (there is no absolute space) and the spacetime geometry
influences the flow of matter/energy. It is therefore utterly meaningless to
talk about a spatial centre for the universe because in GR, space has no
absolute meaning."
As far as I can logically determine, GR has no meaning at all.
Space I can examine and give it meaning.
At the very beginning he opens up with the requirement of moderate
knowledge of modern Physics, and a link to a wiki witch starting with
saying
We all can see how it behaves, its why it
appears to behave that way that physics is at a loss to explain.
How convenient is that definition,
when even in their most critical analysis of what these things ARE, everything
is avoided in the why these things are, with all the emphasis on what these
things do. They can only guess at why.
And finally in a clincher he calls to
a religion for corroboration,
"Appendix:
Vatican admits Galileo correct (from the Los Angeles Times, October 31,
1992)
VATICAN CITY -- It's official: The Earth revolves around the sun,
even for the Vatican."
Whatever JP2's
soul is like only God will know. All we can observe and confirm is his heretical
and apostate actions. These consistently follow the typical Judaeo-Communist
method of speaking with forked tongue, espousing that which calms the orthodox
whilst at the same time supporting the revolution. (read Satan) The rest of the
Vatican as an institution in public follow his lead. That is NOT the Catholic
church established by Christ. What he has said in its complete context, whilst
no longer supporting Tradition, has not gone the other way, but left the
question open. He cannot do that. Its been decided by the church
forever.
The author left me no contact,
to respond, so what he says is irrelevant .
Philip.
PS
When I was a kid of just four years,
My father responded to my many tears,
Don't cry to me you little squirt,
Or I'll show you what it is to hurt.
But he's bigger than me I'd quickly squall,
The bigger they are, the harder they fall,
You little sissy, dont come here whining,
So I learned to run, Instead of divining.
When I was a kid just nine or ten,
Respecting my father much more by then,
A question I'd ask to further my knowledge.
How , when, where, why? he'd always say.
Thats why I became a bastard in college.
I'm no longer a kid, but old and
aware.
Knowing all about how when why and where,
The world carrying on in the deepest
dispair,
Wisdom unappreciated, ignored without care.
A true composition on the spur of the
moment.
