Re: [foxboro] IACC versus ICC
- From: "Goldie, Shaun S" <Shaun.Goldie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:18:52 +1300
Hmmmm this is turning into a very interesting thread
Thanks Alex for your extended effort with the configurator comparisons
I hadn't considered IEE didn't realise it had progressed so far
? How will IEE support hybrid 6.5.x/7.x/8.x systems that include modules
only supported by sysDef
=09eg MB+ integrators and COM15 gateways
The suggestion for me to migrate to FCP's using ICC then change to IEE
at a later date looks inviting
? will IEE be any better at back engineering than IACC
? What are the rules for the loopID field when importing a saveAll into
IACC/foxCAE/IEE using the loop ID grouping
We have only used loop ID as free text but it seems the starting point
to improve changing configurators
Shaun
NZ Steel
=0A=0ANOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain informatio=
n that is confidential and intended only for use by the intended recipien=
t. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for de=
livering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have =
received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use=
of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosur=
e of the information therein. If you have received this message in error =
please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
