Thanks for the info, Matt. We're at 8.4.3, FoxDraw version 10.1. It would be nice to know you could take advantage of the FVFD changes without upgrading to 8.8. I'm interested in how displays that were developed using the 100 x 75 FoxDraw matrix display. Do they get stretched, centered, or does one corner get pinned. When you develop, what are the numeric "dimensions" of the new base display in FoxDraw? Russ >-----Original Message----- >From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kinsinger, Matthew R >Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 1:09 PM >To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: [foxboro] FoxView - FoxDraw using 16:9 or 16:10 >aspect ratios - any progress? > >The new Version of FVFD you need at V8.8 includes it. Not sure >of the pre 8.8 versions that act the same way. Just a caveat, >displays modified in the new FVFD are not readable in most of >the old FVFD versions. So if you have multiple versions >running in the plant, you need to be careful where you make >changes to send to older areas. > >Matt Kinsinger >mkinsinger@xxxxxxx >330-825-1208 > > >-----Original Message----- >From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Russ Kaiser >Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:41 AM >To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [foxboro] FoxView - FoxDraw using 16:9 or 16:10 >aspect ratios - any progress? > >I haven't been too attentive for the last year. Has there >been any progress for the support of truly utilizing wide >screen displays using FoxView/FoxDraw? > >Russ > _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave