Re: [foxboro] CALCA / Foxdraw / BAD I/O Graphic Question
- From: Corey R Clingo <corey.clingo@xxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:47:52 -0500
For motors I wish they had 3 states, and momentaries, a la old-school
Brand H (maybe new-school Brand H, too, I don't know), but yes, GDEVs are
better than the several-CIN/COUT alternative. For on-off valves they are
great. I now typically use them for generic operator-interface "soft
switches" as well, for consistency, and because COUTs do not have
configurable state text.
Corey
From:
dirk.pauwels@xxxxxxxxxx
To:
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
10/06/2011 09:52 AM
Subject:
Re: [foxboro] CALCA / Foxdraw / BAD I/O Graphic Question
Sent by:
foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Use Gdev's, No need for Calc blocks, no need to invent the wheel
again...... We've been using them form the start, but configured for PLB
use. One block gives you the control over the valve and complete status
feedback (STAIND), also has nice features for interlocking etc....
Couldn't live without them.....
Kind regards
Dirk
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
