[ddots-l] Re: sample rate question
- From: "Kevin Gibbs" <kevjazz@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:09:19 -0600
I've used several at 48
-----Original Message-----
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Omar Binno
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 6:48 AM
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: sample rate question
I wonder if most vst's will work only at 44.1?
Omar Binno
AIM: LOD1116
Skype: obinno1
Website: www.omarbinno.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Reid Info <mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:46 AM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: sample rate question
Thanks Gord for clearing that up. I tried Dimension Pro again last night at
96000 and it still doesn't work properly. Also I noticed that the samples
in the Dimension folders are all at 44100 anyway.
Bob.
----- Original Message -----
From: Gordon <mailto:dbmusic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Kent
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 1:12 AM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: sample rate question
Hello:
Cake talkinbg has nothing to do with Sonar's sampling rate. What I may have
said at the time was that in my oppinion, I felt that the extra resources
required to record and play a project at 96k otweighed any benefits that
might be gained. You are using twice as much thruput and with a large
project that will add up.
Gord
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin <mailto:kevjazz@xxxxxxxxx> Gibbs
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 6:48 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: sample rate question
That doesn't make any sense because you should be outputting JAWS through a
different soundcard than your audio goes through.
-----Original Message-----
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Omar Binno
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 5:36 PM
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: sample rate question
Caketalking can actually have an effect on sampling rates?
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Reid <mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxx> Info
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 6:31 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: sample rate question
I remember trying to record Dimension Pro at 96 KHZ and most of the patches
were screwed up in some way. Gordon Kent said at the time that high
sampling rates had never truly been tested with Cake Talking but this may
have changed recently.
Bob.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin <mailto:kevjazz@xxxxxxxxx> Gibbs
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 5:59 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: sample rate question
If you already recorded a project at a given sample rate, you're stuck with
that sample rate for that project. I'm pretty sure that the only way you
can get your soft synths to record at 96K is to start a blank project with
that setting. The reason you're getting the unsupported error is because
your original project may be recorded at a different sample rate, say, 48 or
44.1. In a pinch, you could copy your MIDI tracks and paste them into a new
project at the desired sample rate if you don't wat to reperform your parts.
In addition, there are some cards that only record at certain sample rates.
It's possible at the Edirol you have will only go up to 48K. You'll have to
check your documentation or visit the web for more information on this.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Omar Binno
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 4:39 PM
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] sample rate question
Hello,
I'm trying to switch the sample rate on my edirol card to 96khz. However,
when I open a sonar project, it won't play it and i get an error message
that says something like, "the current audio format is not supported by the
soundcard," or something like that. I know the rate is switched to 96 in
sonar's audio options. The only audio in this project is softsynths. My only
guess is that the softsynths don't support 96khz sampling rate. Is that
correct? If that's the case: is there a way to record/convert those
instruments so that they will play at 96khz?
Thanks.
OMAR BINNO
AIM: LOD1116
SKYPE: obinno1
WEBSITE: www.omarbinno.com
Other related posts: