Hi Steve,Within the terms of his remit...he conducted a full survey and received all the information he requested (if it is a he). The rest of it is classified...
You could try asking him...under the Freedom of Information Act...but I dare say that there will be some law or other which prevents any revelations. Remember, if an inspector or an officer of oversight is too diligent at his job...complaints happen from powerful people and organisations...and they often get moved on...and finish up like Diane Roark, fighting for justice and being thwarted at every turn, for years afterwards.
See, for instance url: http://cryptome.org/2015/01/eagle-ford-task-force-report.pdf Where, after complaints from a number of companies, the inspectors still refused to tone down their inspections and reports and demands for the operation of safety procedures...and were removed from their jobs. They have got "whistleblower" protection of course....
ATB Dougie.On 11/01/15 15:18, Steve Taylor (Redacted sender sctknox@xxxxxxxxx for DMARC) wrote:
He said he did not find anything. How hard did he look?It starts when you begin to overlook good manners. Any time you quit hearing Sir and Mam the end is pretty much in sight...” Cormac McCarthy <http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/4178.Cormac_McCarthy>, /No Country for Old Men <http://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/2996445>STEVE C,TAYLOR /On Sunday, January 11, 2015 6:25 AM, doug <douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:http://cryptome.org/2015/01/dni-14-1230.pdfQuote<<<IG found no instances where classification was used to conceal violation of law, inefficiency, or administrative error; prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency; restrain competition; or prevent or delay the release of information notrequiring protection in the interest of national security. >>>End of Quote.That's alright then... No hanky panky in the intelligence services after all. Everything above board and tickety boo.ATB Dougie.
