[cryptome] IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014
- From: doug <douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:25:40 +0000
http://cryptome.org/2015/01/dni-14-1230.pdf
Quote<<<IG found no instances where classification was used to conceal
violation of law,
inefficiency, or administrative error; prevent embarrassment to a
person, organization,
or agency; restrain competition; or prevent or delay the release of
information not
requiring protection in the interest of national security.
>>>End of Quote.
That's alright then... No hanky panky in the intelligence services
after all. Everything above board and tickety boo.
ATB
Dougie.
- Follow-Ups:
- [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014
- [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014
- [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014
Other related posts:
- » [cryptome] IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014 - doug
- » [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014- Shaun O'Connor
- » [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014- doug
- » [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014- Steve Taylor
- » [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014- doug
- » [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014- Michael Shelton
- » [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014- coderman
- » [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014- doug