[cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014
- From: "Steve Taylor" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "sctknox@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
- To: "cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 15:18:52 +0000 (UTC)
He said he did not find anything. How hard did he look? It starts when you
begin to overlook good manners. Any time you quit hearing Sir and Mam the end
is pretty much in sight...”
Cormac McCarthy, No Country for Old Men
STEVE C,TAYLOR
On Sunday, January 11, 2015 6:25 AM, doug <douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
http://cryptome.org/2015/01/dni-14-1230.pdf
Quote<<<IG found no instances where classification was used to conceal
violation of law, inefficiency, or administrative error; prevent embarrassment
to a person, organization, or agency; restrain competition; or prevent or
delay the release of information not requiring protection in the interest of
national security.
>>>End of Quote.
That's alright then... No hanky panky in the intelligence services after all.
Everything above board and tickety boo.
ATB
Dougie.
Other related posts:
- » [cryptome] IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014- doug
- » [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014- Shaun O'Connor
- » [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014- doug
- » [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014 - Steve Taylor
- » [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014- doug
- » [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014- Michael Shelton
- » [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014- coderman
- » [cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014- doug
