[cryptome] Re: IG Office: Classification Act,Report Number INS,-,2014,-,002,30 December 2014

  • From: "Steve Taylor" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "sctknox@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: "cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 15:18:52 +0000 (UTC)

He said he did not  find anything.  How hard did he look? It starts when you 
begin to overlook good manners. Any time you quit hearing Sir and Mam the end 
is pretty much in sight...” 
 Cormac McCarthy,  No Country for Old Men

     On Sunday, January 11, 2015 6:25 AM, doug <douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx> 

  Quote<<<IG found no instances where classification was used to conceal 
violation of law,  inefficiency, or administrative error; prevent embarrassment 
to a person, organization,  or agency; restrain competition; or prevent or 
delay the release of information not  requiring protection in the interest of 
national security.
 >>>End of Quote.
 That's alright then...  No hanky panky in the intelligence services after all. 
 Everything above board and tickety boo.


Other related posts: