Allen, Philip is on the geocentrism form and this is where he asked me to elaborate on my reasoning regarding NASA claims conflicting with the Bible. That is why I wrote the paper, but I thought it of sufficient interest to have it up as a webpage, rather than simply post it on the forum. Neville. Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Neville, Where is the Aether and Geocentrism posting, referenced below, found? I would like to read all of them in context. Thanks "Dr. Neville Jones" wrote:Thanks, Philip. I feel that we are making some progress. This aether business is interesting, but I can only accept an aether which is frictionless. Thank you for taking the time to read the article and respond (it was in response to your [geocentrism] posting that I wrote it). Neville. Philip wrote: Dear Neville. I have read your new posted article. I must admit that I had the wrong idea of your assumptions. I thought you meant that the Bible spoke specifically against space travel. Now I see it only as a problem of mechanics in a geocentric setting. Thus our difference of opinion, is not Biblical, but mechanical. Whilst we cannot manipulate the Bible, we can manipulate mechanics. I'm glad you got the matter of relativity cleared up. I always mean relative motions. .... I NEVER discuss the magic of the illusive GR. T H E O R Y. ... --------------------------------- ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!