Game looks cool, but whether its "good" or I like it remains to be seen.
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 12:37:38 +0000
Or the new One Piece thing you were talking about?
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben
Sent: 27 January 2016 02:37 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
They need to have a Naruto Ultimate Ninja Storm 4 at Evo!
From:
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 12:20:44 +0000
Back in my day…
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Stephen Scheidel
Sent: 27 January 2016 02:20 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Well this is where we end up because everyone wants the fgc to grow.
Now that we're all grown up the developers choose what games are at tournaments
and therefore what games people care about.
Thanks but no thanks.
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Smash is more of a fighting game than pokken.
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It’s more of a fighting game than Smash is. Popularity counts.
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ilitirit Sama
Sent: 27 January 2016 01:43 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
EVO panders to the company who gives them the most money.
Having Pokken at the tournament is literally a joke.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So Pokken is at Evo apparently
lol
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:17:13 +0200
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Nope.
Prostitutes looks just wont matter as much.
So actually any guy or girl with an occulus and a malleable set of vitrues can
earn a living working the engine room while you watch pornos on the bridge.
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Guy-fi with an occulus rift O_o
It will transform a generally aggressive workplace into peaceful and calm area.
Population of japan will decline even more.
Rape murder in the US will decrease because of Guy-fi occulus edition
Prositution will drastically reduce as with all STD's
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 27 January 2016 09:28 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Whatcha talking about? I have loads of 2d waifus.
Once occulus hits, I’ll have some 3d ones as well.
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Nicholas Robertson-Muir
Sent: 27 January 2016 11:27 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
This why we no family men.
On 27 Jan 2016 11:20, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Candice hilderbrand's shoulder blades?
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 27 January 2016 09:17 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
I just said I would.
Come on stu.
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Really? You wouldn’t hit that?
… it must be nice to have such high standards.
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Stephen Scheidel
Sent: 27 January 2016 08:30 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Nina has a strong back.
I'd like to make love to the gap between her muscled shoulder blades.
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
