RE: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:21:26 +0200

:(
On 18 Feb 2015 14:18, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I cant unfortunatly
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:16:54 +0200
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I'm there. After 5pm, right?
> On 18 Feb 2015 14:13, "euraima tobias" <euraima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There's no loadshedding scheduled so let me know who's keen.
> On 18 Feb 2015 2:11 PM, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Are we doin' Khan's fight night tonight?
> On 18 Feb 2015 14:07, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> lol salie , dat Sanford tech
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:06:18 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I'm not surprised.
> On 18 Feb 2015 14:04, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'd tap that.
> On 18 Feb 2015 14:00, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> http://media.eventhubs.com/images/2015/02/17_kasumi03.jpg
>
> lolz maybe not...
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> The years have clearly been kinder to her than Heihachi.
> On 18 Feb 2015 12:19, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dat heihachi's wife...
>
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-GLXD_CIAARctw.jpg:large
>
> Looking good. Better than all those monster crap from BR
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hopefully this Wonkey guy is wrong.
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Lol, I suck at breaking throws in Tekken, but that's a ridiculous change.
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> http://www.avoidingthepuddle.com/news/2015/2/17/tekken-7-all-13-and-24-throws-can-be-broken-with-either-1-or.html
>
> I hope this isn't true...otherwise, it's going to make the game suck.
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Lili's hair looks nice :)
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoAeIOXYRHw
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mw-EYlDoeA4
>
> Oh shit! Dragunov Sweep = Full combo now :D
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:55 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> lol u not ryt
>
> ------------------------------
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:53:53 +0000
>
>
>  Why not? What are they going to do, sue some random FGC in CT? If they
> do send a cease and desist letter, it will be good publicity.
>
>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 9:48 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>  im really excited about Saturday. SAP has some evil plans for us.
>
> main thing im concerned about is getting dat publicity out.
>
> im imaging an overlay with kamimodo and cts logo. with facebook kuk
> around. im guessing we not allowed to have Capcom characters in the logo?
>
>  ------------------------------
>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:10:56 +0000
>  If you’re not using set bracers, then there are better options – at
> higher levels, Ancient Parthan defenders are amazing for Monk and Barb. Hit
> a group and have reduced damage by 50%.
>
>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 9:01 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>  ive seen players use that shrine bracer , so that when they do get a
> shrine then elites spawn. which is cool because it reduces your time to go
> search for elites.
>
> the only drawback is that the shrine bracers are ass.
>
>  ------------------------------
>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:50:23 +0000
>  I’m guessing you mean for solo runs? Party play is a different thing.
>
> Tier list is something like this:
> 1.       DH
> 2.       Monk
> 3.       WD/Wiz
> 4.       Cru
> 5.       Barb
>
> The GR rankings are skewed by the old conduit farming (and outright
> cheating) players.
>
>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 8:47 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>  I want to see if a similar build to the wizard's cm build pre ros patch
> is possible.
>
> that was the most OP build in all D3 eva.
>
> where is the wizard in terms of tiers among the classes? im guessing he is
> very poo poo tier.
>
>  ------------------------------
>  From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:44:07 +0000
>  Pull is better than stun.
>
>  It essentially does both
>  ------------------------------
>  From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:35:28 +0000
>  ya I saw that but I they haven't done stun as well. only dashing strike
> and palm whole day.
>
> I thought mirane is outdated now? do people still use it? coz out of all
> my gems that's probably the highest.
>
> anyways, I don't think I can get passed 30 grifts comfortably anymore.
>
> most of my gem levelling came from previous patch holy monk build. haven't
> come close to grfit 35 yet.
>
> all of my dmg came from the FD I used when sunwuko gave us the 20% dmg
> buff. now that they've changed that , I don't use 2h's anymore. 1h's ftw.
>
>  ------------------------------
>  From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:29:44 +0000
>  CDR Perma serenity pull/palm monk is probably one of the strongest
> builds in the game.
>  ------------------------------
>  From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:51:36 +0000
>  im using taeguk with gogons swift.
>
> both are level 35.
>
> haven't tried a rift with new build yet. just been farming better rrog's.
>
> rings are nothing special, I use it for the cdr. that's why I need a
> better rrog. getting that balance just right with dmg and cdr is going to
> be a mission.
>
> ultimately what im going for is to be in permanent lighting epiphany and
> perma serenity. then use stun rune. therefore I can go into a fight , and
> stun everyone around me then the team can just pick them off one at a time.
> I haven't seen anyone attempt this build yet.
>
>  ------------------------------
>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:45:01 +0000
>  That’s the major problem with barbs as well. I can get to a rift boss
> with 8 or 9 minutes remaining, but not kill him.
>
> What level rift are you running? Also what rings and gems (checking the
> character link takes too long with my dodgy vpn here).
>
>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 7:42 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>  morning peeps,
>
> ugh I seem to be having a problem.
>
> im able to dispatch mobs quite easily due to fist of azteraq (exploding
> palm deal 80% more dmg)
>
> problem now im getting is single target dps. it takes too long to kill 1
> thing on its own. kuk game
>
>  ------------------------------
>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:10:24 +0000
>  If you need tips on magical schoolgirls, Paas is your man.
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel
> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 11:16 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>  You're gonna have to ask Di about the chibi stuff he's good with that.
>
>  I've always thought about a fg based on the paths of darkness books.
>
> ​
>
>  On 17 February 2015 at 22:02, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> *lol* That's frightfully ambitious :P
> My beat-em-up idea was actually inspired by a little known GBA game
> featuring Tiny Toons characters. The game is forgettable but the concept is
> great. It's a standard beat-em-up at it's core, but with one fundamental
> difference: Assist characters *lol*
> You select a partner from a list of available characters. Each character
> has a special ability that allows you to extend combos or deal with
> multiple enemies. I want to expand on that in a creative way.
> My games will feature ninjas, unsurprisingly :P Chibi female ninjas, to be
> exact.
>  On 17 Feb 2015 21:52, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I want to make a side scrolling beat em up in the graphic style of Guilty
> Gear, the same graphic generating capability of No Man's Sky, the character
> edit functionality of a chinese mmo and the ability to be able to edit
> every character's movelist with all the attacks of the last 10years worth
> of fighting games.
> Oh, and I want it to be cross platform, and have the custom created
> characters to be dlc bosses in other peoples versions of the game.
> Can it do that?
>  On 17 Feb 2015 21:47, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   If you want to make games, jump straight into Game Maker Studio.  The
> standard edition is free.
>
> https://www.yoyogames.com/studio
>  You'll be making games and learning to program at the same time, without
> the hassle of learning the technical stuff.  Plus there's loads of
> tutorials.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vdfs08TyH-U
>  And of course you can make much more complex stuff.
>
> http://sandbox.yoyogames.com/browse?sort=top-rated
>
>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  I've just taken it up as a hobby for now *lol* I've had this idea for a
> game that I'd like to work on once I've improved my knowledge and
> proficiency somewhat, but that's still far off. Right now I'm comfortable
> just getting to grips with the basics.
>
>  The lessons haven't covered looping or arrays yet but I suppose that
> bridge will be crossed eventually :P I've been learning about strings,
> boolean, if/else statements, variables, functions, etc. It's been an
> interesting journey thus far :)
>
>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:50 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Awesome news on programming bro :] It's a pretty rewarding field if you
> stick with it. It can be hard to wrap your head around some of the initial
> concepts but like anything it tends to get easier with time.
>
>  Have you done any form of looping yet? Or arrays? They're probably some
> of the trickier initial concepts if you're starting out.
>
>  An example of a simple but effective exercise would be to try and write
> a function that takes an input and checks whether it's a palindrome, i.e
> whether it reads the same forward of backwards, i.e. bob or level.
> Sometimes just writing down instructions (pseudocode) as you mentioned is
> helpful in starting out with some form of answer.
>
>
>
>
>
>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  I'm starting to learn how important that is *lol*. Giving good
> instructions.
>
>  One of the lessons was to create a "Rock, Paper, Scissors" game. It's
> amazing just how much goes into something so simple (randomisation,
> ensuring that all possible options and decisions are accounted for, etc.).
> If there's even one thing that's out of place, everything else falls apart.
> I have a newfound respect for coders.
>
>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Programming is all about giving good instructions.  If you can give good
> instructions, you can be a good programmer.
>
>  The hard part is functional programming because we don't tend to
> procedurally, not functionally.  And asynchronous programming can be
> tricky, even though in the real world it's a breeze to handle and
> understand because we do everything asynchronously.
>
>  The cool thing about Javascript is that you can use it to learn
> functional and procedural techniques.
>
>
>
>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Well I'm enjoying it so far. I suppose that's the important thing.
> Troubleshooting = problem solving = I have a knack.
>
>  I hate maths though.
>
>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  You need a knack for problem solving. It can be a lot of fun. From time
> to time I will review models and try to track down issues – could be lousy
> macros, poor maths or just bad model governance. That’s more my style than
> straight programming.
> Good luck with it all. I suppose just keep at it.
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 3:16 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>  I've always felt that I don't have a mind for programming, so I'm trying
> to see if I'm wrong.
>
>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Did a couple of years of comp sci at varsity. Quit when I realised it was
> nothing like gaming.
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________________________________
> From: Ryan Williams<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: ‎2015-‎02-‎17 14:54
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
> In my experience, the first few lessons were simple enough to grasp. Shit
> gets real after that. Currently learning functions.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 14:51, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> f I stopped somewhere at the beginning , writing my name or something.
>
> kuk is hard.
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:49:54 +0200
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Yar. Learning Javascript.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 14:49, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> code academy?
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:48:18 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> End of the month.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 14:47, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> So no Kamimodo this week?
> :(
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> I'm learning how to code.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 14:45, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 1...2....3....4....
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:43:44 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Tumbooroo weedo
>
> On 17 February 2015 at 13:07, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> :(
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:01:32 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> @paas
> I see you cannot use the PSN+ Guilty Gear colours on the ps3 version.
> Bummer.
>
> I-no's looks the best tho.
>
> On 17 Feb 2015 11:14, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Egh i stuck running meters and meters of vinyl through a machine today.
> Pretty boring but at least I'm near a pc most of the time.
>
> On 17 February 2015 at 11:10, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> [cid:ii_i692juxm0_14b96cde4c77c2f7]
> ​
>
> On 17 February 2015 at 11:00, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Are you really happy with a win....
>
> YES
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:58:03 +0000
>
>
> Are you really happy with a win where it was the lag that gave it to you,
> not your skill?
>
> Yawn. Having trouble staying awake here.
>
> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
> Sent: 17 February 2015 10:50 AM
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
> winnings winning
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:42:48 +0200
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *lol* You mean like me winning all those matches last night? :P
> On 17 Feb 2015 10:39, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>
> [cid:image001.png@01D04AA0.930D4E90 <https://01D04AA0.930D4E90>]
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:33:07 +0200
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> You call winning once with 16f delay bopping? The fark outta here. You'll
> know what real bopping is on Saturday.
> On 17 Feb 2015 10:30, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> wtf!!!!!!!
>
> sap didn't I bop you last nyt?
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:29:35 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *lol*
> On 17 Feb 2015 10:26, "euraima tobias" <euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> euraima@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Is it GB's? I knew something was up, letting him bop you like that in
> melty... :-?
> On 17 Feb 2015 10:21 AM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> I didn't know you were expecting LB.  Congrats.
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> u violet my expectancy
>
> now im mad
>
> let the bopping commence
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:56:31 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> He's not unsure, he's in denial.
> On 17 Feb 2015 09:55, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> > im unsure whats happening.
> LB's epitaph
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> they probably related to "the answer" somehow.
>
> also I would like closure on the topic of jeeva or kami this week?
>
> im unsure whats happening.
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:31:07 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> You have to assume that they can hack basically anything since they've
> obtained source code to hardware firmware.  These hacks go way back to
> 2001.  Noone knows what they're capable of now.  And you still have to
> consider the capabilities of Russia, China, Europe and Israel.
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Can dey hek my iped?
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Interesting material for people who like reading about hacking and spy
> programs:
>
>
> https://securelist.com/files/2015/02/Equation_group_questions_and_answers.pdf
> tl;dr:  The NSA has an elite hacking group nicknamed "Equation" that,
> among other things, has managed to create spyware that infects PC hard
> drive firmware and can operate undetected.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member
> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>   ------------------------------
>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>        ------------------------------
>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>   ------------------------------
>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>   ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2015