In it to Potempkin it On 18 Feb 2015 14:17, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm there. After 5pm, right? > On 18 Feb 2015 14:13, "euraima tobias" <euraima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> There's no loadshedding scheduled so let me know who's keen. >> On 18 Feb 2015 2:11 PM, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> Are we doin' Khan's fight night tonight? >>> On 18 Feb 2015 14:07, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> lol salie , dat Sanford tech >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:06:18 +0200 >>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> >>>> I'm not surprised. >>>> On 18 Feb 2015 14:04, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'd tap that. >>>> On 18 Feb 2015 14:00, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> http://media.eventhubs.com/images/2015/02/17_kasumi03.jpg >>>> >>>> lolz maybe not... >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The years have clearly been kinder to her than Heihachi. >>>> On 18 Feb 2015 12:19, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dat heihachi's wife... >>>> >>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-GLXD_CIAARctw.jpg:large >>>> >>>> Looking good. Better than all those monster crap from BR >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hopefully this Wonkey guy is wrong. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Lol, I suck at breaking throws in Tekken, but that's a ridiculous >>>> change. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.avoidingthepuddle.com/news/2015/2/17/tekken-7-all-13-and-24-throws-can-be-broken-with-either-1-or.html >>>> >>>> I hope this isn't true...otherwise, it's going to make the game suck. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Lili's hair looks nice :) >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoAeIOXYRHw >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mw-EYlDoeA4 >>>> >>>> Oh shit! Dragunov Sweep = Full combo now :D >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:55 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> lol u not ryt >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:53:53 +0000 >>>> >>>> >>>> Why not? What are they going to do, sue some random FGC in CT? If >>>> they do send a cease and desist letter, it will be good publicity. >>>> >>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets >>>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 9:48 AM >>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> >>>> im really excited about Saturday. SAP has some evil plans for us. >>>> >>>> main thing im concerned about is getting dat publicity out. >>>> >>>> im imaging an overlay with kamimodo and cts logo. with facebook kuk >>>> around. im guessing we not allowed to have Capcom characters in the logo? >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:10:56 +0000 >>>> If you’re not using set bracers, then there are better options – at >>>> higher levels, Ancient Parthan defenders are amazing for Monk and Barb. Hit >>>> a group and have reduced damage by 50%. >>>> >>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets >>>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 9:01 AM >>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> >>>> ive seen players use that shrine bracer , so that when they do get a >>>> shrine then elites spawn. which is cool because it reduces your time to go >>>> search for elites. >>>> >>>> the only drawback is that the shrine bracers are ass. >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:50:23 +0000 >>>> I’m guessing you mean for solo runs? Party play is a different thing. >>>> >>>> Tier list is something like this: >>>> 1. DH >>>> 2. Monk >>>> 3. WD/Wiz >>>> 4. Cru >>>> 5. Barb >>>> >>>> The GR rankings are skewed by the old conduit farming (and outright >>>> cheating) players. >>>> >>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets >>>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 8:47 AM >>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> >>>> I want to see if a similar build to the wizard's cm build pre ros >>>> patch is possible. >>>> >>>> that was the most OP build in all D3 eva. >>>> >>>> where is the wizard in terms of tiers among the classes? im guessing he >>>> is very poo poo tier. >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:44:07 +0000 >>>> Pull is better than stun. >>>> >>>> It essentially does both >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:35:28 +0000 >>>> ya I saw that but I they haven't done stun as well. only dashing >>>> strike and palm whole day. >>>> >>>> I thought mirane is outdated now? do people still use it? coz out of >>>> all my gems that's probably the highest. >>>> >>>> anyways, I don't think I can get passed 30 grifts comfortably anymore. >>>> >>>> most of my gem levelling came from previous patch holy monk build. >>>> haven't come close to grfit 35 yet. >>>> >>>> all of my dmg came from the FD I used when sunwuko gave us the 20% dmg >>>> buff. now that they've changed that , I don't use 2h's anymore. 1h's ftw. >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:29:44 +0000 >>>> CDR Perma serenity pull/palm monk is probably one of the strongest >>>> builds in the game. >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:51:36 +0000 >>>> im using taeguk with gogons swift. >>>> >>>> both are level 35. >>>> >>>> haven't tried a rift with new build yet. just been farming better >>>> rrog's. >>>> >>>> rings are nothing special, I use it for the cdr. that's why I need a >>>> better rrog. getting that balance just right with dmg and cdr is going to >>>> be a mission. >>>> >>>> ultimately what im going for is to be in permanent lighting epiphany >>>> and perma serenity. then use stun rune. therefore I can go into a fight , >>>> and stun everyone around me then the team can just pick them off one at a >>>> time. I haven't seen anyone attempt this build yet. >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:45:01 +0000 >>>> That’s the major problem with barbs as well. I can get to a rift boss >>>> with 8 or 9 minutes remaining, but not kill him. >>>> >>>> What level rift are you running? Also what rings and gems (checking the >>>> character link takes too long with my dodgy vpn here). >>>> >>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets >>>> *Sent:* 18 February 2015 7:42 AM >>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> >>>> morning peeps, >>>> >>>> ugh I seem to be having a problem. >>>> >>>> im able to dispatch mobs quite easily due to fist of azteraq (exploding >>>> palm deal 80% more dmg) >>>> >>>> problem now im getting is single target dps. it takes too long to kill >>>> 1 thing on its own. kuk game >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:10:24 +0000 >>>> If you need tips on magical schoolgirls, Paas is your man. >>>> >>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >>>> Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel >>>> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 11:16 PM >>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> >>>> You're gonna have to ask Di about the chibi stuff he's good with that. >>>> >>>> I've always thought about a fg based on the paths of darkness books. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 17 February 2015 at 22:02, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> *lol* That's frightfully ambitious :P >>>> My beat-em-up idea was actually inspired by a little known GBA game >>>> featuring Tiny Toons characters. The game is forgettable but the concept is >>>> great. It's a standard beat-em-up at it's core, but with one fundamental >>>> difference: Assist characters *lol* >>>> You select a partner from a list of available characters. Each >>>> character has a special ability that allows you to extend combos or deal >>>> with multiple enemies. I want to expand on that in a creative way. >>>> My games will feature ninjas, unsurprisingly :P Chibi female ninjas, to >>>> be exact. >>>> On 17 Feb 2015 21:52, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I want to make a side scrolling beat em up in the graphic style of >>>> Guilty Gear, the same graphic generating capability of No Man's Sky, the >>>> character edit functionality of a chinese mmo and the ability to be able to >>>> edit every character's movelist with all the attacks of the last 10years >>>> worth of fighting games. >>>> Oh, and I want it to be cross platform, and have the custom created >>>> characters to be dlc bosses in other peoples versions of the game. >>>> Can it do that? >>>> On 17 Feb 2015 21:47, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> If you want to make games, jump straight into Game Maker Studio. >>>> The standard edition is free. >>>> >>>> https://www.yoyogames.com/studio >>>> You'll be making games and learning to program at the same time, >>>> without the hassle of learning the technical stuff. Plus there's loads of >>>> tutorials. >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vdfs08TyH-U >>>> And of course you can make much more complex stuff. >>>> >>>> http://sandbox.yoyogames.com/browse?sort=top-rated >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I've just taken it up as a hobby for now *lol* I've had this idea for >>>> a game that I'd like to work on once I've improved my knowledge and >>>> proficiency somewhat, but that's still far off. Right now I'm comfortable >>>> just getting to grips with the basics. >>>> >>>> The lessons haven't covered looping or arrays yet but I suppose that >>>> bridge will be crossed eventually :P I've been learning about strings, >>>> boolean, if/else statements, variables, functions, etc. It's been an >>>> interesting journey thus far :) >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:50 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Awesome news on programming bro :] It's a pretty rewarding field if >>>> you stick with it. It can be hard to wrap your head around some of the >>>> initial concepts but like anything it tends to get easier with time. >>>> >>>> Have you done any form of looping yet? Or arrays? They're probably >>>> some of the trickier initial concepts if you're starting out. >>>> >>>> An example of a simple but effective exercise would be to try and >>>> write a function that takes an input and checks whether it's a palindrome, >>>> i.e whether it reads the same forward of backwards, i.e. bob or level. >>>> Sometimes just writing down instructions (pseudocode) as you mentioned is >>>> helpful in starting out with some form of answer. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm starting to learn how important that is *lol*. Giving good >>>> instructions. >>>> >>>> One of the lessons was to create a "Rock, Paper, Scissors" game. It's >>>> amazing just how much goes into something so simple (randomisation, >>>> ensuring that all possible options and decisions are accounted for, etc.). >>>> If there's even one thing that's out of place, everything else falls apart. >>>> I have a newfound respect for coders. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Programming is all about giving good instructions. If you can give >>>> good instructions, you can be a good programmer. >>>> >>>> The hard part is functional programming because we don't tend to >>>> procedurally, not functionally. And asynchronous programming can be >>>> tricky, even though in the real world it's a breeze to handle and >>>> understand because we do everything asynchronously. >>>> >>>> The cool thing about Javascript is that you can use it to learn >>>> functional and procedural techniques. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Well I'm enjoying it so far. I suppose that's the important thing. >>>> Troubleshooting = problem solving = I have a knack. >>>> >>>> I hate maths though. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> You need a knack for problem solving. It can be a lot of fun. From >>>> time to time I will review models and try to track down issues – could be >>>> lousy macros, poor maths or just bad model governance. That’s more my style >>>> than straight programming. >>>> Good luck with it all. I suppose just keep at it. >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams >>>> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 3:16 PM >>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> >>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> >>>> I've always felt that I don't have a mind for programming, so I'm >>>> trying to see if I'm wrong. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Did a couple of years of comp sci at varsity. Quit when I realised it >>>> was nothing like gaming. >>>> >>>> Sent from my Windows Phone >>>> ________________________________ >>>> From: Ryan Williams<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> Sent: 2015-02-17 14:54 >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> >>>> >>>> In my experience, the first few lessons were simple enough to grasp. >>>> Shit gets real after that. Currently learning functions. >>>> >>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:51, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> f I stopped somewhere at the beginning , writing my name or something. >>>> >>>> kuk is hard. >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:49:54 +0200 >>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> >>>> Yar. Learning Javascript. >>>> >>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:49, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> code academy? >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:48:18 +0200 >>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> >>>> End of the month. >>>> >>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:47, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx >>>> <mailto:ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> So no Kamimodo this week? >>>> :( >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >>>> <mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm learning how to code. >>>> >>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:45, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> 1...2....3....4.... >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:43:44 +0200 >>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Tumbooroo weedo >>>> >>>> On 17 February 2015 at 13:07, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> <mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> :( >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:01:32 +0200 >>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> @paas >>>> I see you cannot use the PSN+ Guilty Gear colours on the ps3 version. >>>> Bummer. >>>> >>>> I-no's looks the best tho. >>>> >>>> On 17 Feb 2015 11:14, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >>>> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> Egh i stuck running meters and meters of vinyl through a machine today. >>>> Pretty boring but at least I'm near a pc most of the time. >>>> >>>> On 17 February 2015 at 11:10, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >>>> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> [cid:ii_i692juxm0_14b96cde4c77c2f7] >>>> >>>> >>>> On 17 February 2015 at 11:00, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> Are you really happy with a win.... >>>> >>>> YES >>>> >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:58:03 +0000 >>>> >>>> >>>> Are you really happy with a win where it was the lag that gave it to >>>> you, not your skill? >>>> >>>> Yawn. Having trouble staying awake here. >>>> >>>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets >>>> Sent: 17 February 2015 10:50 AM >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> >>>> winnings winning >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:42:48 +0200 >>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> *lol* You mean like me winning all those matches last night? :P >>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:39, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> [cid:image001.png@01D04AA0.930D4E90 <https://01D04AA0.930D4E90>] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:33:07 +0200 >>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> You call winning once with 16f delay bopping? The fark outta here. >>>> You'll know what real bopping is on Saturday. >>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:30, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> wtf!!!!!!! >>>> >>>> sap didn't I bop you last nyt? >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:29:35 +0200 >>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> *lol* >>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:26, "euraima tobias" <euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>> euraima@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> Is it GB's? I knew something was up, letting him bop you like that in >>>> melty... :-? >>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:21 AM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> I didn't know you were expecting LB. Congrats. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> u violet my expectancy >>>> >>>> now im mad >>>> >>>> let the bopping commence >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:56:31 +0200 >>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> He's not unsure, he's in denial. >>>> On 17 Feb 2015 09:55, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> > im unsure whats happening. >>>> LB's epitaph >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> they probably related to "the answer" somehow. >>>> >>>> also I would like closure on the topic of jeeva or kami this week? >>>> >>>> im unsure whats happening. >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:31:07 +0200 >>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> You have to assume that they can hack basically anything since they've >>>> obtained source code to hardware firmware. These hacks go way back to >>>> 2001. Noone knows what they're capable of now. And you still have to >>>> consider the capabilities of Russia, China, Europe and Israel. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Stephen Scheidel < >>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> Can dey hek my iped? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx >>>> <mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> Interesting material for people who like reading about hacking and spy >>>> programs: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://securelist.com/files/2015/02/Equation_group_questions_and_answers.pdf >>>> tl;dr: The NSA has an elite hacking group nicknamed "Equation" that, >>>> among other things, has managed to create spyware that infects PC hard >>>> drive firmware and can operate undetected. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>> >>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>> >>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>> >>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>> AntiVirus software. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ********************************************************************** >>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>> >>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>> >>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. >>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member >>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>> >>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>> AntiVirus software. >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>> >>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>> >>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>> >>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>> AntiVirus software. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>> >>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>> >>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>> >>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>> AntiVirus software. >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>> >>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>> >>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>> >>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>> AntiVirus software. >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>> >>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>> >>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>> >>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>> AntiVirus software. >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>> >>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>> >>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>> >>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>> AntiVirus software. >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>> >>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>> >>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>> >>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>> AntiVirus software. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>