RE: DRE: CTS community mail

From: lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:01:00 +0000
ive seen players use that shrine bracer , so that when they do get a shrine 
then elites spawn. which is cool because it reduces your time to go search for 
elites.
 
the only drawback is that the shrine bracers are ass.
 
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:50:23 +0000









I’m guessing you mean for solo runs? Party play is a different thing.
 
Tier list is something like this:
1.      
DH
2.      
Monk
3.      
WD/Wiz
4.      
Cru
5.      
Barb
 
The GR rankings are skewed by the old conduit farming (and outright cheating) 
players.
 


From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets

Sent: 18 February 2015 8:47 AM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail


 

I want to see if a similar build to the wizard's cm build pre ros patch is 
possible.

 

that was the most OP build in all D3 eva.

 

where is the wizard in terms of tiers among the classes? im guessing he is very 
poo poo tier.

 




From:
paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:44:07 +0000

Pull is better than stun.

 


It essentially does both




From:
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:35:28 +0000

ya I saw that but I they haven't done stun as well. only dashing strike and 
palm whole day.

 

I thought mirane is outdated now? do people still use it? coz out of all my 
gems that's probably the highest.

 

anyways, I don't think I can get passed 30 grifts comfortably anymore.

 

most of my gem levelling came from previous patch holy monk build. haven't come 
close to grfit 35 yet.

 

all of my dmg came from the FD I used when sunwuko gave us the 20% dmg buff. 
now that they've changed that , I don't use 2h's anymore. 1h's ftw.

 




From:
paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:29:44 +0000

CDR Perma serenity pull/palm monk is probably one of the strongest builds in 
the game.




From:
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:51:36 +0000

im using taeguk with gogons swift.

 

both are level 35.

 

haven't tried a rift with new build yet. just been farming better rrog's.

 

rings are nothing special, I use it for the cdr. that's why I need a better 
rrog. getting that balance just right with dmg and cdr is going to be a mission.

 

ultimately what im going for is to be in permanent lighting epiphany and perma 
serenity. then use stun rune. therefore I can go into a fight , and stun 
everyone around me then the team can just pick them off one at a time. I 
haven't seen anyone attempt this
 build yet.

 




From:
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:45:01 +0000

That’s the major problem with barbs as well. I can get to a rift boss with 8 or 
9 minutes remaining, but not kill him.
 
What level rift are you running? Also what rings and gems (checking the 
character link takes too long with my dodgy vpn here).
 


From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets

Sent: 18 February 2015 7:42 AM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail


 

morning peeps,

 

ugh I seem to be having a problem.

 

im able to dispatch mobs quite easily due to fist of azteraq (exploding palm 
deal 80% more dmg)

 

problem now im getting is single target dps. it takes too long to kill 1 thing 
on its own. kuk game

 




From: 
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:10:24 +0000

If you need tips on magical schoolgirls, Paas is your man.
 
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Stephen Scheidel

Sent: 17 February 2015 11:16 PM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
 

You're gonna have to ask Di about the chibi stuff he's good with that.

 


I've always thought about a fg based on the paths of darkness books.








 

On 17 February 2015 at 22:02, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

*lol* That's frightfully ambitious :P

My beat-em-up idea was actually inspired by a little known GBA game featuring 
Tiny Toons characters. The game is forgettable but the concept is great. It's a 
standard beat-em-up at it's core, but with one fundamental difference: Assist 
characters *lol*

You select a partner from a list of available characters. Each character has a 
special ability that allows you to extend combos or deal with multiple enemies. 
I want to expand on that in a creative way.

My games will feature ninjas, unsurprisingly :P Chibi female ninjas, to be 
exact.

On 17 Feb 2015 21:52, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



I want to make a side scrolling beat em up in the graphic style of Guilty Gear, 
the same graphic generating capability of No Man's Sky, the character edit 
functionality of a chinese mmo and
 the ability to be able to edit every character's movelist with all the attacks 
of the last 10years worth of fighting games.

Oh, and I want it to be cross platform, and have the custom created characters 
to be dlc bosses in other peoples versions of the game.

Can it do that?

On 17 Feb 2015 21:47, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:




If you want to make games, jump straight into Game Maker Studio.  The standard 
edition is free.



https://www.yoyogames.com/studio

You'll be making games and learning to program at the same time, without the 
hassle of learning the technical stuff.  Plus there's loads of tutorials.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vdfs08TyH-U

And of course you can make much more complex stuff.



http://sandbox.yoyogames.com/browse?sort=top-rated


 

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


I've just taken it up as a hobby for now *lol* I've had this idea for a game 
that I'd like to work on once I've improved my knowledge and proficiency 
somewhat, but that's still far off. Right
 now I'm comfortable just getting to grips with the basics.

 


The lessons haven't covered looping or arrays yet but I suppose that bridge 
will be crossed eventually :P I've been learning about strings, boolean, 
if/else statements, variables, functions,
 etc. It's been an interesting journey thus far :)





 

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:50 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Awesome news on programming bro :] It's a pretty rewarding field if you stick 
with it. It can be hard to wrap your head around some of the initial concepts 
but like anything it tends to get
 easier with time.

 


Have you done any form of looping yet? Or arrays? They're probably some of the 
trickier initial concepts if you're starting out. 


 


An example of a simple but effective exercise would be to try and write a 
function that takes an input and checks whether it's a palindrome, i.e whether 
it reads the same forward of backwards,
 i.e. bob or level. Sometimes just writing down instructions (pseudocode) as 
you mentioned is helpful in starting out with some form of answer. 


 


 


 


 





 

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


I'm starting to learn how important that is *lol*. Giving good instructions.

 


One of the lessons was to create a "Rock, Paper, Scissors" game. It's amazing 
just how much goes into something so simple (randomisation, ensuring that all 
possible options and decisions
 are accounted for, etc.). If there's even one thing that's out of place, 
everything else falls apart. I have a newfound respect for coders.



 

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:




Programming is all about giving good instructions.  If you can give good 
instructions, you can be a good programmer.  

 


The hard part is functional programming because we don't tend to procedurally, 
not functionally.  And asynchronous programming can be tricky, even though in 
the real world it's a breeze to
 handle and understand because we do everything asynchronously.


 


The cool thing about Javascript is that you can use it to learn functional and 
procedural techniques.


 


 





 

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Well I'm enjoying it so far. I suppose that's the important thing. 
Troubleshooting = problem solving = I have a knack.

 


I hate maths though.





 

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair 
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



You need a knack for problem solving. It can be a lot of fun. From time to time 
I will review models and try to track down issues – could be lousy macros, poor
 maths or just bad model governance. That’s more my style than straight 
programming.
Good luck with it all. I suppose just keep at it.
 
 
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ryan Williams

Sent: 17 February 2015 3:16 PM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx




Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail




 

I've always felt that I don't have a mind for programming, so I'm trying to see 
if I'm wrong.


 

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair 
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Did a couple of years of comp sci at varsity. Quit when I realised it was 
nothing like gaming.



Sent from my Windows Phone

________________________________

From: Ryan Williams<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>

Sent: ‎2015-‎02-‎17 14:54

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail





In my experience, the first few lessons were simple enough to grasp. Shit gets 
real after that. Currently learning functions.



On 17 Feb 2015 14:51, "lindsey kiviets" 
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

f I stopped somewhere at the beginning , writing my name or something.



kuk is hard.



________________________________

Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:49:54 +0200

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>





Yar. Learning Javascript.



On 17 Feb 2015 14:49, "lindsey kiviets" 
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

code academy?



________________________________

Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:48:18 +0200

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>





End of the month.



On 17 Feb 2015 14:47, "Ashraf Barendse" 
<ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

So no Kamimodo this week?

:(



On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ryan Williams 
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:



I'm learning how to code.



On 17 Feb 2015 14:45, "lindsey kiviets" 
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

1...2....3....4....



________________________________

Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:43:44 +0200

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>



Tumbooroo weedo



On 17 February 2015 at 13:07, Wynand-Ben 
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

:(



________________________________

Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:01:32 +0200

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>







@paas

I see you cannot use the PSN+ Guilty Gear colours on the ps3 version.

Bummer.



I-no's looks the best tho.



On 17 Feb 2015 11:14, "Stephen Scheidel" 
<gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Egh i stuck running meters and meters of vinyl through a machine today.

Pretty boring but at least I'm near a pc most of the time.



On 17 February 2015 at 11:10, Stephen Scheidel 
<gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

[cid:ii_i692juxm0_14b96cde4c77c2f7]





On 17 February 2015 at 11:00, lindsey kiviets 
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Are you really happy with a win....



YES





________________________________

From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:58:03 +0000





Are you really happy with a win where it was the lag that gave it to you, not 
your skill?



Yawn. Having trouble staying awake here.



From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
 On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets

Sent: 17 February 2015 10:50 AM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail



winnings winning



________________________________

Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:42:48 +0200

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

*lol* You mean like me winning all those matches last night? :P

On 17 Feb 2015 10:39, "lindsey kiviets" 
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:





[cid:image001.png@01D04AA0.930D4E90]







________________________________

Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:33:07 +0200

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

You call winning once with 16f delay bopping? The fark outta here. You'll know 
what real bopping is on Saturday.

On 17 Feb 2015 10:30, "lindsey kiviets" 
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

wtf!!!!!!!



sap didn't I bop you last nyt?



________________________________

Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:29:35 +0200

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

*lol*

On 17 Feb 2015 10:26, "euraima tobias" 
<euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Is it GB's? I knew something was up, letting him bop you like that in melty... 
:-?

On 17 Feb 2015 10:21 AM, "Ilitirit Sama" 
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

I didn't know you were expecting LB.  Congrats.



On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, lindsey kiviets 
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

u violet my expectancy



now im mad



let the bopping commence



________________________________

Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:56:31 +0200

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>



He's not unsure, he's in denial.

On 17 Feb 2015 09:55, "Ilitirit Sama" 
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

> im unsure whats happening.

LB's epitaph



On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM, lindsey kiviets 
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

they probably related to "the answer" somehow.



also I would like closure on the topic of jeeva or kami this week?



im unsure whats happening.



________________________________

Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:31:07 +0200

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>



You have to assume that they can hack basically anything since they've obtained 
source code to hardware firmware.  These hacks go way back to 2001.  Noone 
knows what they're capable of now.  And you still have to consider the 
capabilities of Russia, China,
 Europe and Israel.



On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Stephen Scheidel 
<gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Can dey hek my iped?





On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Ilitirit Sama 
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Interesting material for people who like reading about hacking and spy programs:



https://securelist.com/files/2015/02/Equation_group_questions_and_answers.pdf

tl;dr:  The NSA has an elite hacking group nicknamed "Equation" that, among 
other things, has managed to create spyware that infects PC hard drive firmware 
and can operate undetected.







________________________________

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please 
address with the subject heading
 "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and 
destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in 
reliance on it, is prohibited
 and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are 
subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client 
engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail 
and any attachments that do not
 relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by 
it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.



This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such. Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.











**********************************************************************


The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received
 this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received 
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any
 action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may 
be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the 
terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. 
Opinions, conclusions
 and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to 
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.



This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such.  Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.




 









The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received
 this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received 
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any
 action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may 
be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the 
terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. 
Opinions, conclusions
 and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to 
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.




This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such. Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.





 





 







 



 





 





 









 





The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received
 this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received 
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any
 action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may 
be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the 
terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. 
Opinions, conclusions
 and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to 
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.




This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such. Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.






The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received
 this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received 
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any
 action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may 
be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the 
terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. 
Opinions, conclusions
 and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to 
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.




This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such. Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.













The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please 
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original 
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the 
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken 
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and 
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, 
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do 
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed 
by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. 



This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms 
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to 
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and 
separate entity and each describes itself as such.  Information about the 
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.
Follow-Ups:
- RE: DRE: CTS community mail
  - From: Donaldson, Alasdair
References:
- RE: DRE: CTS community mail
  - From: Wynand-Ben
- RE: DRE: CTS community mail
  - From: lindsey kiviets
- RE: DRE: CTS community mail
  - From: Donaldson, Alasdair
RE: DRE: CTS community mail

Other related posts:
