Yeah a middle ground understanding sounds good. On 16 February 2015 at 15:47, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > lol, I hear you. I think there's a happy compromise somewhere in the > middle of all of this though. > > If people simply consumed less one wouldn't need to cut down the > population. It's easier to adjust your lifestyle than it is to play with > population sizes I'd think. Also, even if you cut down the population in > terms of size, what's to stop the remaining population from simply wanting > even more? > > My wife and I share a meal at Burger King. We literally cut the thing in > half. I'm not saying everyone needs to share their burgers but my point is > that one meal fills both of us sufficiently. People tend to base how much > they eat on what size their meal comes in and tend to overestimate how much > the really need :P > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> What? >> You do realize that you need more things for more people right ? >> Less people ~ less things needed. >> Population control doesn't have to be approached like china or whatever. >> People just need to realize that they should replace themselves, not >> multiply like crazy. >> But then you get into the whole "don't tell me how many kids I can have" >> thing. >> >> Conclusion I've come to when talking about this issue is that most people >> would rather have a big family over a sustainable environment. >> And when you try to talk the about conservation for the future they >> completely disregard it as someone else's problem. >> >> Basically Stu hates Earth. >> >> On 16 February 2015 at 15:19, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> Countries with stable populations usually have stable economies or >>> whatever it is that allows them to be be happy. >>> I know the tax in most of these countries is very very high but it's >>> fine because everyone receiving is also paying. >>> >>> >>> On 16 February 2015 at 15:15, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> I tend to agree - I think the bigger issue has got to do with resource >>>> distribution. People tend to want more than what they really need. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Huh? >>>>> >>>>> Too many for what? There is enough space for people to live, more than >>>>> enough food for the whole planet. >>>>> >>>>> Sure there are lots of issues in the world but overpopulation isn’t >>>>> actually one of them. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel >>>>> *Sent:* 16 February 2015 3:00 PM >>>>> >>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Almost every problem we have as people here on on earth is that there >>>>> are just too many of us. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 16 February 2015 at 14:57, Nicholas Robertson-Muir < >>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Just wrote 4 paragraphs of my thoughts on racism and then deleted it. >>>>> >>>>> Fuck politics. >>>>> >>>>> On 16 Feb 2015 14:49, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Damn Japs, why they gotta be racist. Slanty-eyed rice eaters. >>>>> >>>>> :P >>>>> >>>>> HBD Jag. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yeah. It's not they discriminate and treat you differently. If >>>>> you're whatever race and you go to japan. They treat you nicely. It's just >>>>> the idea of sharing their environment with people they don't know or >>>>> foreigners. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Also a lot of issue started when Japan allowed thailand to travel to >>>>> japan by getting a tourist visa on arrival...A LOT of illegal immigrants >>>>> went in to Japan. I think at least 6,000 in the first 3 months. And the >>>>> thai tourist are very loud and dirty...throwing shit everywhere, not >>>>> lining >>>>> up, etc. Fuelling the japanese xenophobia even more. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Stephen Scheidel < >>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Well there is a difference between pride and hating others. >>>>> >>>>> I get what Di is saying though ~ basically it's not so much that they >>>>> hate other people (they obviously do to some extent) but more that they >>>>> just want to be around their own kind. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 16 February 2015 at 14:36, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Pride? >>>>> >>>>> It’s not pride behind racism. It’s hate. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong >>>>> *Sent:* 16 February 2015 2:31 PM >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Well, asians are pretty racist and xenophobic...so i'm not too >>>>> surprise they wrote something like that. They're pretty racist and >>>>> xenophobic among themselves too. Chinese vs Japanese. Thai vs everyone >>>>> else. Etc. Too much pride in their own race and country. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Stephen Scheidel < >>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I think it was on some comedy show I was watching where the guy >>>>> covers some similar stuff. >>>>> >>>>> Some old sports team owner was caught saying something racist and >>>>> there was a big stink. >>>>> >>>>> What the fuck do they expect ? the parents of Americans who are 80+ >>>>> now where the generation that finished off the Native american holocaust >>>>> ffs. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It just sucks when these old geezers still have some power in the >>>>> world and you can't just wheel them down the hallway like crazy old >>>>> grandma. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 16 February 2015 at 14:21, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Forced segregation is a shit idea and never works. >>>>> >>>>> I hope nobody is too surprised by this Japanese womans' ideas. >>>>> >>>>> Keep in mind she was 8 years old when the Americans dropped the bombs >>>>> on them. >>>>> >>>>> She is 83 now. >>>>> >>>>> To expect anything but racism and xenophobia out of her is a bit much. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It's all super wrong but we just shouldn't be surprised. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 16 February 2015 at 14:08, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> HBD Jagson. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 16 February 2015 at 13:46, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, read about this earlier. How fucked up can you get. >>>>> >>>>> On 16 Feb 2015 13:04, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Japan please... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/11414141/Japanese-author-provokes-furious-South-African-response-by-suggesting-a-new-apartheid.html >>>>> >>>>> On 16 Feb 2015 12:53, "Moshe Shevel" <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Haha thanks guys :) >>>>> >>>>> On 16 Feb 2015 12:47 PM, "Sameegh Jardine" <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Happy Birthday Jag, hope you have an awesome one :] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 16 Feb 2015, at 12:41 PM, "Donaldson, Alasdair" < >>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Oh, nice one Ilit. You couldn’t have posted that first thing this >>>>> morning, could you? So we’re now all the schmucks who didn’t realise it >>>>> was >>>>> his birthday. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In other news, HDB Jag. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >>>>> Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama >>>>> *Sent:* 16 February 2015 12:37 PM >>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> HBD Jag! >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send >>>>> to >>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in >>>>> this >>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>>> >>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>>> >>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. >>>>> Information >>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>>> >>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>>> AntiVirus software. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send >>>>> to >>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in >>>>> this >>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>>> >>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>>> >>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. >>>>> Information >>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>>> >>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>>> AntiVirus software. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send >>>>> to >>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in >>>>> this >>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>>> >>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>>> >>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. >>>>> Information >>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>>> >>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>>> AntiVirus software. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >