Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:25:23 +0200

@Di
Neill is godlike and I loved District 9, maybe a sequel?
How did you find Elyisium?
I was a little disappointed by it.
On 11 Feb 2015 12:01, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Neill Blomkamp may direct Alien sequal with Ripley? Yes please! this needs
> to happen.
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Yeah. I tend to go to movies without reading reviews or pay too much on
>> trailers nowadays. That way i go in with 0 expectation and i can fully
>> review it without being sceptic by rottentomatoes or other reviews.
>>
>> Like Cabin in the Woods. I had no idea what that movie was suppose to be.
>> Thought it was another slasher flick. Was happy it was a whole new level of
>> movie.
>>
>> But movies that push A LOT of CGI and trailers makes me doubt
>> sometimes...cough cough* Hobbit...
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Never buy into the "hype" that surrounds blockbuster movies.
>>>
>>> It only leads to disappointment
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:41:12 +0200
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>> I was expecting better and was sorely dissapointed.
>>> On 11 Feb 2015 11:38, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Gravity is pretty indeed.  Thing looks great.
>>>
>>> The plot and stuff is decent but wont blow anybody away.  Was expecting
>>> worse and liked it in the end.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:34:18 +0000
>>>
>>>  I’ve got Enter the Void lying around, but haven’t got around to
>>> watching it. Same with Under the Skin. No idea who Tarkovksy is. Just
>>> checked IMDB. Nope. Are his films worth watching? I mean from a
>>> non-technical perspective.
>>>
>>> First time I saw the Massive Attack video, I didn’t realise that it was
>>> all one shot. I just assumed they’d cut it. I forget what the song was
>>> called, but it was more than 5min long.
>>> Snake Eyes was an okay film. It wasn’t bad or good… actually can’t
>>> remember much about the film.
>>>
>>> I don’t know if I can be arsed to watch Gravity. Maybe I’ll put it on
>>> sometime while I’m reading. The only thing that I’ve heard about Gravity is
>>> that it is a very pretty film. No one seems to care about the story or
>>> script. That seems like a bit of a fail to me.
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
>>> *Sent:* 11 February 2015 11:15 AM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>  I haven't seen either, but last year there was Gravity which had a 17
>>> minute opening shot.  Under the Skin had shots the seem to be influenced by
>>> filmmakers like Tarkovksy.  The Protector has a 4 minute long shot (the
>>> stair case fight scene).  Enter the Void is composed of long shots (about 1
>>> to 2 minutes in length), joined together by psychedelic visuals.
>>>  In The Sacrifice, Tarkovsky's crew built a special house meant to be
>>> burned down in a 6 minute long shot.  Toward the end of the shot the camera
>>> jammed and the film was ruined.  It took them two weeks to refilm it.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr5cYiRPf3E
>>>
>>>  On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  It opened at Cinema Nouveau up here.
>>> Long scenes are cool. Barring Massive Attack, nothing comes to mind
>>> though. Oh, wasn’t the first 10min of Snake Eyes a single shot?
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
>>> *Sent:* 11 February 2015 10:46 AM
>>>
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>  Low budget?  Yes.  And it only opened in 4 cinemas, raking in less
>>> than $500k.  But it's probably best considered Arthouse, not B movie.
>>>  You can't not notice the camera work in Birdman.  The entire movie,
>>> barring 1 or 2 scenes in the beginning is shot in one long continuous
>>> sequence.  It's obviously an illusion but it's still great to watch.  There
>>> are scenes where they film in front of a mirror and you can't see the
>>> camera.  There's a seen where the camera follows Michael Keaton through a
>>> busy square in NYC.  And a great scene where the camera glides from the
>>> theatre rafters to the stage below.
>>>
>>>  On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:32 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  for best gimmick in a film
>>>
>>> soim guessing if birdman was shot in 30 days , that would make it a low
>>> budget B movie?
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:29:06 +0000
>>>
>>>  Then I suppose they’d be guaranteed the Oscar.
>>>
>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>> *Sent:* 11 February 2015 7:24 AM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>  boyhood - what if the kid died during that 12 years?
>>>
>>> "rock is overpowered, paper is fine" - scissors
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:09:25 +0000
>>>  I tend to figure that the camera work is only something you notice if
>>> it’s done badly. I can’t recall when last I noticed good camera work in a
>>> film.
>>> Same with most of the things, I guess. It’s only when the music is
>>> jarring and detracts from the scene that I actually notice it.
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
>>> *Sent:* 11 February 2015 12:50 AM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>  Sheesh... apparently the movie was shot in only 30 days.
>>>
>>>  On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Birdman's camera work is amazing.  I haven't been that technically
>>> impressed by a movie in a long itme.  All the while I kept thinking "I
>>> can't imagine how hard it must have been to film this".  Fantastic
>>> cinematography.
>>>
>>>
>>>   ------------------------------
>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>   ------------------------------
>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>     ------------------------------
>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2015