Re: CTS community mail
- From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:08:07 +0200
Ashraf, could you hit us up with the the details?
Al, I'll have to enquire about the specifics.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What does a session cost? How many people does he need to be regular
> members? I mean does he have a sliding scale for discount depending on the
> number of us there are, and what level of discount are we talking about?
>
>
>
> Just throwing this out. If you need extra people to buy memberships, I can
> do that, but I don’t know how many actual sessions I’ll be able to make.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 17 November 2014 12:53 PM
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> It will depend on my availability but I'll let you know closer to the
> time. For now, if we are going to do this, I need a show of hands in terms
> of who is interested in applying for the group membership so that I can
> revert to Zaid.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Ashraf Barendse <
> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yo we in there dawg.
>
> Sap, if you're going on friday, then i'm available in the afternoon until
> 6.
>
>
>
> On a side note. I'm glad I was finally able to beat gb's blanka in a ft5,
> thanks to the Salie gravity training.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
> im down with kammimodo, I like this guy's drive.
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:41:36 +0200
>
>
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Noted.
>
>
>
> Response from Zaid:
>
>
>
> "Hey Man...yep Kamimodo is sarting to pick up nicely. Okay so sat we are
> open from about 10 till midnight (opening hours vary according to how
> hectic the night before is to be honest lol) but usually around 10am. IF
> you guys are keen on hanging out later than midnight Im sure we can
> accomodate you since we kinda have the 24hr plan thing in our scope so
> perhaps a "let me know before hand" type situation is best...Sleepovers are
> definately not a problem but the same principle as before applies you gotta
> let me know so I can make arrangements. We could definately work out a
> discount for you and your guys...on that front you would have to let me
> know how many of you guys will be signing up (sort of a group discount
> special membership considering your own consoles etc)...Theres some added
> benefits too like cafe discounts and bookings, free tourny entry etcIf you
> can get me those numbers im sure I can sort you guys out with a decent
> price. My only condition and this is DEAD SERIOUS....you gotta let me jam
> with you guys. Im sort of a "jack of all trades" gamer with my speciality
> in racing games but with fighting games coming in a close second and I've
> been looking for an excuse to become more serious...your tutelage will be
> most welcomed"
>
>
>
> "If you would like to chat some more let me know when you can make a turn
> at the shop and we can see how we can accomodate each other further (Maybe
> you wna host a consistant fight night or something for free thus bringing
> us business and you guys get to jam for free)...somthing like that...I
> would love Kamimodo to be able to help CTS grow and vice versa if you know
> what I mean. I don't want us to have a simple service customer relationship
> since Im really keen on growing the community...so let me know if you wna
> brainstorm some things im open to any and all ideas"
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:16 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I think we need to discuss this in detail.
>
> I don't want to burn my bridges with Jeeva, since we have something good
> going there.
>
> I believe its a case of miscommunication, since Jeeva has been a good guy.
>
> @ Nick , please.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:49:10 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> We'd have to confirm. I'll chat to Zaid about it.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Since the only thing that affects me is Evo weekend, how does the Kami
> place look for extended stays – more than 24hrs?
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ashraf Barendse
> *Sent:* 17 November 2014 10:45 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: CTS community mail
>
>
>
>
>
> I'm also leaning towards Kamimodo. In addition to the reasons you posted,
> I really used to enjoy session at Geco while it lasted, and we could get a
> similar vibe at Kamimodo.
>
> Hopefully we can get a decent rate, since like you said, we'll be using
> our own equipment.
>
>
>
> All we really need is the space, internet usage, and maybe one of their
> PCs would be nice.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
>
>
> Some of you already know my feelings on this matter, so I'm just sharing
> this with those who don't.
>
>
>
> In light of recent 'developments' at the GamerNET house, I think it's time
> for us to consider relocating.
>
>
>
> We've had a good run there, but things are changing - and not necessarily
> for the better, in my opinion.
>
>
>
> I don't mind change. If it is good, or beneficial in some way, I'm all for
> it. Right now, it seems like these changes are benefiting an individual and
> not a collective.
>
>
>
> So let me get right to the 'meat and potatoes' of what this is all about.
> We get there on Saturday and start setting up. There's a car parked outside
> at Jeeva's house that most of the regulars have already come to associate
> with 'quiet time'. Now, this 'quiet time' I'm referring to is when IT
> training has been scheduled at Jeeva's house. During the training period,
> we are promptly told to shut the fuck up until such time as training has
> been concluded.
>
>
>
> I understand that Jeeva's house is a registered training institution. I
> understand that he has to make ends meet and that this is just another
> source of income. What I don't like is that other people who pay to be
> there get the shaft because of how he feels he should conduct business.
> This is gripe number one.
>
>
>
> Gripe number two was when I wanted to set up the Challonge brackets for
> the standard Sat tourney, only to realise that the internet connection
> wasn't working (ethernet link to Jeeva's network). Not only that, but the
> wireless details had also changed. Again, not typically something that one
> would feel the need to complain about, provided that shit gets properly
> communicated.
>
>
>
> Which brings me to gripe number three; a distinct lack of communication
> these days. Jeeva's just making changes without informing anyone. Maybe
> we're just not 'important' enough to inform. Or perhaps, changes like these
> don't warrant explanation, as far as he's concerned. It's fine for him to
> send me an sms on any given Saturday to inform me that 'the guys are making
> too much noise, can they please keep it down between 12pm and 1pm', but he
> can't even communicate something as simple as 'hi guys, I had to change the
> internet/network settings to accommodate the students/training personnel,
> so if you want to use the internet, please use these new credentials'. Shit
> like this pisses me off.
>
>
>
> I'm starting to feel like we've overstayed our welcome and that Jeeva is
> trying, in a very subtle, manner, to get us to leave. It's an assumption on
> my part, I'll admit - but if someone isn't setting the record straight and
> actually communicating this shit, then assumptions are all I have.
>
>
>
> So here's what I'm looking to do. I'll be chatting to Zaid this week about
> sessioning at Kamimodo and ask him if it would be possible for us to
> perhaps get a discount on the monthly rate, seeing as how we'd be bringing
> our own consoles and screens.
>
>
>
> What I would like is to hear from everyone before we commit to anything.
> I'd like to hear your thoughts on the matter. How do you feel about the way
> things are at the GamerNET house currently? Do you feel there's some merit
> to what I'm saying? Would you prefer that we try to make the most of a
> slightly unpleasant situation or consider alternatives? Please feel free to
> voice your opinions.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> So where did you find the info?
> ------------------------------
>
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 07:33:26 +0000
>
>
>
> oh I see its not in the video.
>
> Well the mkg set is being nerfed, where clones only spawn when using
> tempest rush and the dmg is reduced to 500%.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 07:16:25 +0000
>
> What sunwuko nerf? Mentioned where?
>
>
>
> Rest of the news is almost 2 weeks old...
> ------------------------------
>
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 20:28:23 +0000
>
>
> so sunwuko's getting a nerf tsek,
>
> RAIMENT IS IN WOOOOOOOP, tsek paas.
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgrVA0PWl5o&list=UURl31PWkfF0a3j3hiDRaCGA
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 20:54:55 +0200
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Nice :)
> On 16 Nov 2014 20:50, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Something you arcade heads may find interesting/cool
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiRPH6uDF9U
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 17:52:14 +0200
> >
> > Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > Confirmed by CEO:
> >
> https://www.facebook.com/Quizup/posts/640523729343276?comment_id=6071726&offset=0&total_comments=34
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> So after playing QuizUp for about 30 minutes I've come to the
> conclusion that most of the "players" are actually bots that just choose
> random answers. The app will match you up with a bot if no human players
> are available.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
Other related posts:
