Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: euraima tobias <euraima@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 21:24:59 +0200
here's a crazy idea, why dont we all go out for supper one night in the
week? maybe towards month end, what'ya say? i vote takumi, but ill eat
anything really.
@GB clean up the inputs, emphasize ending the dp motion with down-forward.
see if it helps.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:38 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hmmm, if you're using Viper you can probably utilize negative edge for
> many of her inputs. So maybe you can try something like crouch fierce +
> crouching medium (hold in inputs), input EX Seismo motion only then release
> inputs once the motion finishes.
>
> I'm sure Salie or Khan would know.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:19 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Gotta say, AE is almost as 'delicate' as KOF when it comes to entering
>> commands.
>>
>> Seriously, if I hear Viper say "Full Charge, this will finish you" or
>> whatever the hell she says, she I do crouch fierce in EX Seismo... I'm
>> going to go nuts!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not a sushi guy.
>>>
>>> But I will by default be category 3 ~ If i'm with a sushi G at a G sushi
>>> place I'll tuck in like a G.
>>> I just get put off by how much slop run of the mill stuff there is out
>>> there.
>>>
>>> Think about the poor Tuna ;(
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14 January 2014 07:10, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ryu and Ken have *very* slightly different hurt/push boxes. I noticed
>>>> this when I was working on some Blanka setups.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:50 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> yeah, thats what makes it whiff. now wee, Ken reels too, but the combo
>>>>> is simpler on him, or what? anyway, if you say it isn't the same, then it
>>>>> probably isn't. Thanks though.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you see how Ryu sometimes reels back sometimes? That's what makes
>>>>>> the combo hard to land vs him. Do a focus attack first, practice
>>>>>> against a
>>>>>> different character, or do the cr.mk variation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:42 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZN-3fk4LJk0&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, two and a slide is basically what I do, and then follow with
>>>>>>> the tostada presses :-) They should make that break focus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL. I figured if I can just master RSF, then it doesn't matter how
>>>>>>> badly I play him, I just need to land the combo :-) HEHEHE
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Ilitirit Sama
>>>>>>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you haven't stunned them then just do two and end in slide.
>>>>>>>> There are lots of factors to take into account (initial distance, char
>>>>>>>> width, reel animation, screen position etc). Boxer and Sagat and maybe
>>>>>>>> Seth are the easiest to do it on.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You shouldn't even worry about that stuff yet. Hardest thing with
>>>>>>>> Fuerte is movement and his brand of "footsies". Watch TKD play. He
>>>>>>>> moves
>>>>>>>> around for 30s doing seemingly random stuff but all he is doing is
>>>>>>>> baiting
>>>>>>>> jumps and projectiles so that he can land a EX DP or Ultra. If you
>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>> react at all, he goes ham on you. It's a lose-lose situation unless
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> can match his movement, which is extremely hard to do without making a
>>>>>>>> mistake.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Poongko also has a good Fuerte:
>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSjFcYDohlk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:22 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Will watch these now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Seems like there are different timings for certain characters?
>>>>>>>>> Either that or its all in my head. It doesn't feel like it though.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Like, I can do 2 on anybody no matter the distance or situation
>>>>>>>>> pretty simply, except on Ryu, E.Ryu and Ken.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When I tried now, I changed the timing just a bit, after watching
>>>>>>>>> that video you put up.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For Ryu, I let elf run abt... 1/2 frame longer before I stop
>>>>>>>>> fierce. Its actually easier on Ryu, E.Ryu and Ken, since its a bit
>>>>>>>>> slower
>>>>>>>>> but... I'll have to adjust.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't know if there is a simpler way to do this. I just picked
>>>>>>>>> up Elf, did that last trial and tried to see if I could do more than
>>>>>>>>> 3. So
>>>>>>>>> if the inputs are incorrect, don't kill me. ill upload in a bit
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They once had a kumite where TKD faced all 17 characters in
>>>>>>>>>> Vanilla:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKvbC_4nWAQ&list=PL61DDF92CE41F3F75
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> El Fuerte was bottom tier in Vanilla SFIV, but everyone hated
>>>>>>>>>>> playing against TKD because he was just that good. Mago once said
>>>>>>>>>>> Sagat vs
>>>>>>>>>>> Fuerte is 8:2 in Vanilla Sagat's favour, except against TKD.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irVyT6o6N1s
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He was REALLY good with Fuerte.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> El Fuerte was bottom tier in Vanilla SFIV, but everyone hated
>>>>>>>>>>> playing against TKD because he was just that good. Mago once said
>>>>>>>>>>> Sagat vs
>>>>>>>>>>> Fuerte is 8:2 in Vanilla Sagat's favour, except against TKD.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irVyT6o6N1s
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He was REALLY good with Fuerte.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:47 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL! That ELF is awesome!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok. I'm going to try now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Practice on Sagat. I can only do like 4 max on anyone. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have dumb fingers. You should be able to land more than 3 on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ryu. Here
>>>>>>>>>>>>> TKD (best ELF ever) lands 4 after a stun:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyOhAMtyCdw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They had an El Fuerte festival at a Japanese arcade a few
>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago. Everyone dressed like Fuerte and everyone played him,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and they
>>>>>>>>>>>>> had a mini tourney to see who could do the highest combo. TKD
>>>>>>>>>>>>> won it. RSF
>>>>>>>>>>>>> into stun, RSF into super.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:28 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, does RSF loop work on everybody? I can't do it to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone, it seems. e.g. I've managed to get 7 on Adon but not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even 3 on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ryu? Fierce whiffs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:26 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I like to try something new all the time. Usually when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I go out, I usually try hotels and stuff, but not really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything deep in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Town.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So hidden gems and 'you've totally got to try' places alike
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be great.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seeing as how I haven't heard of any of these places you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guys have mentioned, I'm willing to give it a shot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want to know about? Best burgers? Tapas?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sushi? Pizza?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's mostly subjective and there are other factors (eg. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't like Cafe Manhattans burgers because I don't eat bacon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> essential to balancing out the taste of the blue cheese), and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of "best of" lists out there that compile popular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions. When we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> go out, we like to check out "hidden gems" and places that are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off people's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radars. A lot of the things we also like to try won't really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeal to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> average Cape Town pallete (pigeon brains, anyone?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:09 PM, G B
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can somebody compile a list of these places sometime?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is what sushi looks like at the best sushi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restaurant in the world:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://also.kottke.org/misc/images/jiros-sushi.jpg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm. Sap, what did you think of that sushi place we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went to?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 3:00 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are the first person I have met then who thinks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While I havent personally been to japan everyone else I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know who went came back generally un-impressed with regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to sushi over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that it just looks uninteristing/boring/bland
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in general compared to what we have on offer here imo...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No idea if any of the places ive been to had proper
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chefs. Doesnt matter if it tastes good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:47:55 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow, you got a maki roll up your butt about this stuff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or something?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was recommending the other place because it actually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a sushi chef, not some random fish chef who knows how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to roll salmon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> roses. As for actual Japanese sushi, I’d say it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> massively better than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the stuff we get here. I dunno, that’s just based on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sushi that I ate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Japan.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:40 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pretty much all our sushi is westernised sushi...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you dont want that then just order the bland shit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:35:15 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yup, for Westernised sushi, Willoughby is pretty good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:33 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just go to to Willoughby & Co for Sushi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck the other frauds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:29:56 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW Tzeitel, if you’re looking for a proper sushi place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometime, I’d also recommend Minato’s -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g312659-d1118597-Reviews-Minato-Cape_Town_Central_Western_Cape.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The food is excellent, but the service is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little...odd. The waitress (who I think is the chef’s wife)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> told us that we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn’t know what we were doing with the orders and that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> she’d just bring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever the chef decided to make.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you might be better off with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.capetownmagazine.com/takumi. Well, better
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decor anyway.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I dunno if there are any other places in Cape Town where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can actually get a real sushi chef doing the stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:16 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not yet, give me time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14 Jan 2014 14:02, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From the name I assumed it would be nsfw.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Williams
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:02 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *lol* The Nic!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Very entertaining :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:42 PM, G B <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://youtu.be/ZqFl_e1WOGA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They could have saved themselves the embarrassment and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just done this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the beginning.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have they fixed the issue with the civilians losing the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plot?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I was playing till nearly 11pm. You could have just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent me a message via
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Steam Chat.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Noone saw this coming...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.simcity.com/en_US/blog/article/simcity-offline-is-coming
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:46 AM, lindsey kiviets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Gb you missing out man. KOF matches are intensifying
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> online.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> scumbag ilitrit says we must play on dolphin, doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show up to get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> beat.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:42:54 +0200
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Oh yes. Wow, sorry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Yeah, I saw that on TFG.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> We all know that this is going to suck though. Even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it is directed by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> the Ong Bak guy, it would probably just be a "wow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cool fight scene"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> movie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> that with Tekken- characters that don't follow the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proper story... at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> If the other Tekken movie was called BloodSport 2099
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or something, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> probably wouldn't hate it as much.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Even the CGI Tekken movie was absurd. I don't get it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Ilitirit Sama
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> He's referring to her seismo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> New Tekken movie by Ong Bak director.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-01-13-theres-a-new-tekken-movie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:38 PM, G B <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> She has a command throw?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Not that I need a command throw to turn her into a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grappler ;-p
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On 13 Jan 2014 19:39, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Imagine you're playing as Shen when picking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C.Viper... only with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> more...Benimaru...and K'... and Daimon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On 13 Jan 2014 18:15, "G B" <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> That is what you told me since you met me. Play
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sakura, Cammy or Viper.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Ugh, those feints look like a bother to do but hey,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll give her a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> proper
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> bash. Should be fun.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> First ten second of the video looks like fun.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Was watching this guy Zeny53's Elf... LOL. The guy is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the best.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> @GB:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I really think you would enjoy C.Viper in SSFIV.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She's really cheap and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> her pressure game is kinda like what a KOF character
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXFonlAPlWw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =========================================================================
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Community mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressee. Access to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heading "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail and destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions or advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG member firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinating entity for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name. KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International provides no services to clients. Each member
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International is a legally distinct and separate entity and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each describes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as such. Information about the structure and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction of your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressee. Access to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heading "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail and destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions or advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG member firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinating entity for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name. KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International provides no services to clients. Each member
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International is a legally distinct and separate entity and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each describes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as such. Information about the structure and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction of your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressee. Access to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heading "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail and destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions or advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG member firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinating entity for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name. KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International provides no services to clients. Each member
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International is a legally distinct and separate entity and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each describes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as such. Information about the structure and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction of your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressee. Access to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heading "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail and destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions or advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG member firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinating entity for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name. KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International provides no services to clients. Each member
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International is a legally distinct and separate entity and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each describes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as such. Information about the structure and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction of your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressee. Access to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heading "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail and destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions or advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG member firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinating entity for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name. KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International provides no services to clients. Each member
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International is a legally distinct and separate entity and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each describes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as such. Information about the structure and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction of your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
