Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

  • From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:05:27 +0200

Count me in :)


On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:24 PM, euraima tobias <euraima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> here's a crazy idea, why dont we all go out for supper one night in the
> week? maybe towards month end, what'ya say? i vote takumi, but ill eat
> anything really.
>
> @GB clean up the inputs, emphasize ending the dp motion with down-forward.
> see if it helps.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:38 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Hmmm, if you're using Viper you can probably utilize negative edge for
>> many of her inputs. So maybe you can try something like crouch fierce +
>> crouching medium (hold in inputs), input EX Seismo motion only then release
>> inputs once the motion finishes.
>>
>>  I'm sure Salie or Khan would know.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:19 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Gotta say, AE is almost as 'delicate' as KOF when it comes to entering
>>> commands.
>>>
>>> Seriously, if I hear Viper say "Full Charge, this will finish you" or
>>> whatever the hell she says, she I do crouch fierce in EX Seismo... I'm
>>> going to go nuts!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm not a sushi guy.
>>>>
>>>> But I will by default be category 3 ~ If i'm with a sushi G at a G
>>>> sushi place I'll tuck in like a G.
>>>> I just get put off by how much slop run of the mill stuff there is out
>>>> there.
>>>>
>>>> Think about the poor Tuna ;(
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 14 January 2014 07:10, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ryu and Ken have *very* slightly different hurt/push boxes.  I
>>>>> noticed this when I was working on some Blanka setups.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:50 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> yeah, thats what makes it whiff. now wee, Ken reels too, but the
>>>>>> combo is simpler on him, or what? anyway, if you say it isn't the same,
>>>>>> then it probably isn't. Thanks though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you see how Ryu sometimes reels back sometimes?  That's what
>>>>>>> makes the combo hard to land vs him.  Do a focus attack first, practice
>>>>>>> against a different character, or do the cr.mk variation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:42 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZN-3fk4LJk0&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, two and a slide is basically what I do, and then follow with
>>>>>>>> the tostada presses :-)  They should make that break focus.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL. I figured if I can just master RSF, then it doesn't matter how
>>>>>>>> badly I play him, I just need to land the combo :-) HEHEHE
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Ilitirit Sama 
>>>>>>>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you haven't stunned them then just do two and end in slide.
>>>>>>>>> There are lots of factors to take into account (initial distance, char
>>>>>>>>> width, reel animation, screen position etc).  Boxer and Sagat and 
>>>>>>>>> maybe
>>>>>>>>> Seth are the easiest to do it on.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You shouldn't even worry about that stuff yet.  Hardest thing with
>>>>>>>>> Fuerte is movement and his brand of "footsies".  Watch TKD play.  He 
>>>>>>>>> moves
>>>>>>>>> around for 30s doing seemingly random stuff but all he is doing is 
>>>>>>>>> baiting
>>>>>>>>> jumps and projectiles so that he can land a EX DP or Ultra.  If you 
>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>> react at all, he goes ham on you.  It's a lose-lose situation unless 
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> can match his movement, which is extremely hard to do without making a
>>>>>>>>> mistake.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Poongko also has a good Fuerte:
>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSjFcYDohlk
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:22 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Will watch these now.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Seems like there are different timings for certain characters?
>>>>>>>>>> Either that or its all in my head. It doesn't feel like it though.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Like, I can do 2 on anybody no matter the distance or situation
>>>>>>>>>> pretty simply, except on Ryu, E.Ryu and Ken.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When I tried now, I changed the timing just a bit, after watching
>>>>>>>>>> that video you put up.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For Ryu, I let elf run abt... 1/2 frame longer before I stop
>>>>>>>>>> fierce. Its actually easier on Ryu, E.Ryu and Ken, since its a bit 
>>>>>>>>>> slower
>>>>>>>>>> but... I'll have to adjust.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't know if there is a simpler way to do this. I just picked
>>>>>>>>>> up Elf, did that last trial and tried to see if I could do more than 
>>>>>>>>>> 3. So
>>>>>>>>>> if the inputs are incorrect, don't kill me. ill upload in a bit
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> They once had a kumite where TKD faced all 17 characters in
>>>>>>>>>>> Vanilla:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKvbC_4nWAQ&list=PL61DDF92CE41F3F75
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> El Fuerte was bottom tier in Vanilla SFIV, but everyone hated
>>>>>>>>>>>> playing against TKD because he was just that good.  Mago once said 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sagat vs
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fuerte is 8:2 in Vanilla Sagat's favour, except against TKD.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irVyT6o6N1s
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> He was REALLY good with Fuerte.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> El Fuerte was bottom tier in Vanilla SFIV, but everyone hated
>>>>>>>>>>>> playing against TKD because he was just that good.  Mago once said 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sagat vs
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fuerte is 8:2 in Vanilla Sagat's favour, except against TKD.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irVyT6o6N1s
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> He was REALLY good with Fuerte.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:47 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL! That ELF is awesome!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok. I'm going to try now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Practice on Sagat.  I can only do like 4 max on anyone.  I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have dumb fingers.  You should be able to land more than 3 on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ryu.  Here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TKD (best ELF ever) lands 4 after a stun:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyOhAMtyCdw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They had an El Fuerte festival at a Japanese arcade a few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago.  Everyone dressed like Fuerte and everyone played 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him, and they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had a mini tourney to see who could do the highest combo.  TKD 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won it.  RSF
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into stun, RSF into super.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:28 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, does RSF loop work on everybody? I can't do it to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone, it seems. e.g. I've managed to get 7 on Adon but not 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even 3 on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ryu? Fierce whiffs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:26 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I like to try something new all the time. Usually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when I go out, I usually try hotels and stuff, but not really 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything deep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in  Town.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So hidden gems and 'you've totally got to try' places alike
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be great.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seeing as how I haven't heard of any of these places you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guys have mentioned, I'm willing to give it a shot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want to know about?  Best burgers?  Tapas?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sushi?  Pizza?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's mostly subjective and there are other factors (eg. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't like Cafe Manhattans burgers because I don't eat bacon, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> essential to balancing out the taste of the blue cheese), and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of "best of" lists out there that compile popular 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions.  When we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> go out, we like to check out "hidden gems" and places that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are off people's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> radars.  A lot of the things we also like to try won't really 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeal to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> average Cape Town pallete (pigeon brains, anyone?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:09 PM, G B 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can somebody compile a list of these places sometime?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is what sushi looks like at the best sushi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restaurant in the world:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://also.kottke.org/misc/images/jiros-sushi.jpg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Hmmm. Sap, what did you think of that sushi place we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went to?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 3:00 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are the first person I have met then who thinks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While I havent personally been to japan everyone else I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know who went came back generally un-impressed with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards to sushi over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that it just looks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uninteristing/boring/bland in general compared to what we 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have on offer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here imo...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No idea if any of the places ive been to had proper
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chefs.  Doesnt matter if it tastes good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:47:55 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow, you got a maki roll up your butt about this stuff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or something?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was recommending the other place because it actually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a sushi chef, not some random fish chef who knows how 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to roll salmon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> roses. As for actual Japanese sushi, I’d say it is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> massively better than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the stuff we get here. I dunno, that’s just based on the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sushi that I ate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Japan.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:40 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pretty much all our sushi is westernised sushi...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you dont want that then just order the bland shit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:35:15 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yup, for Westernised sushi, Willoughby is pretty good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:33 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just go to to Willoughby & Co for Sushi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck the other frauds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:29:56 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW Tzeitel, if you’re looking for a proper sushi place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometime, I’d also recommend Minato’s -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g312659-d1118597-Reviews-Minato-Cape_Town_Central_Western_Cape.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The food is excellent, but the service is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little...odd. The waitress (who I think is the chef’s 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wife) told us that we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn’t know what we were doing with the orders and that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> she’d just bring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever the chef decided to make.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you might be better off with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.capetownmagazine.com/takumi. Well, better
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decor anyway.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I dunno if there are any other places in Cape Town
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where you can actually get a real sushi chef doing the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:16 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not yet, give me time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14 Jan 2014 14:02, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From the name I assumed it would be nsfw.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Williams
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:02 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *lol* The Nic!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Very entertaining :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:42 PM, G B <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://youtu.be/ZqFl_e1WOGA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They could have saved themselves the embarrassment and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just done this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the beginning.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have they fixed the issue with the civilians losing the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plot?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I was playing till nearly 11pm.  You could have just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent me a message via
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Steam Chat.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Noone saw this coming...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.simcity.com/en_US/blog/article/simcity-offline-is-coming
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:46 AM, lindsey kiviets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Gb you missing out man. KOF matches are intensifying
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> online.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> scumbag ilitrit says we must play on dolphin,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't show up to get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> beat.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:42:54 +0200
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Oh yes. Wow, sorry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Yeah, I saw that on TFG.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> We all know that this is going to suck though. Even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it is directed by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> the Ong Bak guy, it would probably just be a "wow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cool fight scene"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> movie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> that with Tekken- characters that don't follow the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proper story... at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> If the other Tekken movie was called BloodSport 2099
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or something, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> probably wouldn't hate it as much.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Even the CGI Tekken movie was absurd. I don't get it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Ilitirit Sama
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> He's referring to her seismo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> New Tekken movie by Ong Bak director.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-01-13-theres-a-new-tekken-movie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:38 PM, G B <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> She has a command throw?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Not that I need a command throw to turn her into a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grappler ;-p
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On 13 Jan 2014 19:39, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Imagine you're playing as Shen when picking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C.Viper... only with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> more...Benimaru...and K'... and Daimon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On 13 Jan 2014 18:15, "G B" <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> That is what you told me since you met me. Play
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sakura, Cammy or Viper.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Ugh, those feints look like a bother to do but hey,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll give her a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> proper
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> bash. Should be fun.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> First ten second of the video looks like fun.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Was watching this guy Zeny53's Elf... LOL. The guy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the best.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> @GB:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I really think you would enjoy C.Viper in SSFIV.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  She's really cheap and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> her pressure game is kinda like what a KOF character
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXFonlAPlWw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =========================================================================
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Community mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressee. Access to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heading "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail and destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions or advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG member firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinating entity for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name. KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International provides no services to clients. Each member 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International is a legally distinct and separate entity 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and each describes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as such. Information about the structure and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction of your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressee. Access to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heading "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail and destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions or advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG member firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinating entity for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name. KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International provides no services to clients. Each member 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International is a legally distinct and separate entity 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and each describes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as such. Information about the structure and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction of your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressee. Access to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heading "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail and destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions or advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG member firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinating entity for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name. KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International provides no services to clients. Each member 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International is a legally distinct and separate entity 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and each describes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as such. Information about the structure and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction of your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressee. Access to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heading "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail and destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions or advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG member firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinating entity for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name. KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International provides no services to clients. Each member 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International is a legally distinct and separate entity 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and each describes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as such. Information about the structure and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction of your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressee. Access to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heading "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail and destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions or advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG member firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinating entity for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name. KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International provides no services to clients. Each member 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International is a legally distinct and separate entity 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and each describes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as such. Information about the structure and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction of your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Other related posts: