Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:32:11 -0800
I'm not a sushi guy.
But I will by default be category 3 ~ If i'm with a sushi G at a G sushi
place I'll tuck in like a G.
I just get put off by how much slop run of the mill stuff there is out
there.
Think about the poor Tuna ;(
On 14 January 2014 07:10, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ryu and Ken have *very* slightly different hurt/push boxes. I noticed
> this when I was working on some Blanka setups.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:50 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> yeah, thats what makes it whiff. now wee, Ken reels too, but the combo is
>> simpler on him, or what? anyway, if you say it isn't the same, then it
>> probably isn't. Thanks though.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>
>>> Do you see how Ryu sometimes reels back sometimes? That's what makes
>>> the combo hard to land vs him. Do a focus attack first, practice against a
>>> different character, or do the cr.mk variation.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:42 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZN-3fk4LJk0&feature=youtu.be
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, two and a slide is basically what I do, and then follow with the
>>>> tostada presses :-) They should make that break focus.
>>>>
>>>> LOL. I figured if I can just master RSF, then it doesn't matter how
>>>> badly I play him, I just need to land the combo :-) HEHEHE
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If you haven't stunned them then just do two and end in slide. There
>>>>> are lots of factors to take into account (initial distance, char width,
>>>>> reel animation, screen position etc). Boxer and Sagat and maybe Seth are
>>>>> the easiest to do it on.
>>>>>
>>>>> You shouldn't even worry about that stuff yet. Hardest thing with
>>>>> Fuerte is movement and his brand of "footsies". Watch TKD play. He moves
>>>>> around for 30s doing seemingly random stuff but all he is doing is baiting
>>>>> jumps and projectiles so that he can land a EX DP or Ultra. If you don't
>>>>> react at all, he goes ham on you. It's a lose-lose situation unless you
>>>>> can match his movement, which is extremely hard to do without making a
>>>>> mistake.
>>>>>
>>>>> Poongko also has a good Fuerte:
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSjFcYDohlk
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:22 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Will watch these now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seems like there are different timings for certain characters? Either
>>>>>> that or its all in my head. It doesn't feel like it though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like, I can do 2 on anybody no matter the distance or situation
>>>>>> pretty simply, except on Ryu, E.Ryu and Ken.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I tried now, I changed the timing just a bit, after watching
>>>>>> that video you put up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For Ryu, I let elf run abt... 1/2 frame longer before I stop fierce.
>>>>>> Its actually easier on Ryu, E.Ryu and Ken, since its a bit slower but...
>>>>>> I'll have to adjust.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know if there is a simpler way to do this. I just picked up
>>>>>> Elf, did that last trial and tried to see if I could do more than 3. So
>>>>>> if
>>>>>> the inputs are incorrect, don't kill me. ill upload in a bit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They once had a kumite where TKD faced all 17 characters in Vanilla:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKvbC_4nWAQ&list=PL61DDF92CE41F3F75
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama
>>>>>>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> El Fuerte was bottom tier in Vanilla SFIV, but everyone hated
>>>>>>>> playing against TKD because he was just that good. Mago once said
>>>>>>>> Sagat vs
>>>>>>>> Fuerte is 8:2 in Vanilla Sagat's favour, except against TKD.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irVyT6o6N1s
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He was REALLY good with Fuerte.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama
>>>>>>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> El Fuerte was bottom tier in Vanilla SFIV, but everyone hated
>>>>>>>> playing against TKD because he was just that good. Mago once said
>>>>>>>> Sagat vs
>>>>>>>> Fuerte is 8:2 in Vanilla Sagat's favour, except against TKD.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irVyT6o6N1s
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He was REALLY good with Fuerte.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:47 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LOL! That ELF is awesome!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ok. I'm going to try now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Practice on Sagat. I can only do like 4 max on anyone. I have
>>>>>>>>>> dumb fingers. You should be able to land more than 3 on Ryu. Here
>>>>>>>>>> TKD
>>>>>>>>>> (best ELF ever) lands 4 after a stun:
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyOhAMtyCdw
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They had an El Fuerte festival at a Japanese arcade a few years
>>>>>>>>>> ago. Everyone dressed like Fuerte and everyone played him, and they
>>>>>>>>>> had a
>>>>>>>>>> mini tourney to see who could do the highest combo. TKD won it.
>>>>>>>>>> RSF into
>>>>>>>>>> stun, RSF into super.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:28 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Also, does RSF loop work on everybody? I can't do it to
>>>>>>>>>>> everyone, it seems. e.g. I've managed to get 7 on Adon but not even
>>>>>>>>>>> 3 on
>>>>>>>>>>> Ryu? Fierce whiffs
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:26 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I like to try something new all the time. Usually when I
>>>>>>>>>>>> go out, I usually try hotels and stuff, but not really anything
>>>>>>>>>>>> deep in
>>>>>>>>>>>> Town.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So hidden gems and 'you've totally got to try' places alike
>>>>>>>>>>>> would be great.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Seeing as how I haven't heard of any of these places you guys
>>>>>>>>>>>> have mentioned, I'm willing to give it a shot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want to know about? Best burgers? Tapas?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sushi? Pizza?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's mostly subjective and there are other factors (eg. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't like Cafe Manhattans burgers because I don't eat bacon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> essential to balancing out the taste of the blue cheese), and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of "best of" lists out there that compile popular opinions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> When we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> go out, we like to check out "hidden gems" and places that are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> off people's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> radars. A lot of the things we also like to try won't really
>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeal to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> average Cape Town pallete (pigeon brains, anyone?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:09 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can somebody compile a list of these places sometime?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is what sushi looks like at the best sushi restaurant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the world:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://also.kottke.org/misc/images/jiros-sushi.jpg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm. Sap, what did you think of that sushi place we went
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 3:00 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are the first person I have met then who thinks that...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While I havent personally been to japan everyone else I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know who went came back generally un-impressed with regards to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sushi over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that it just looks uninteristing/boring/bland in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> general compared to what we have on offer here imo...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No idea if any of the places ive been to had proper chefs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doesnt matter if it tastes good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:47:55 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow, you got a maki roll up your butt about this stuff or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was recommending the other place because it actually has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a sushi chef, not some random fish chef who knows how to roll
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> salmon roses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for actual Japanese sushi, I’d say it is massively better
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than the stuff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we get here. I dunno, that’s just based on the sushi that I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ate in Japan.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:40 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pretty much all our sushi is westernised sushi...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you dont want that then just order the bland shit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:35:15 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yup, for Westernised sushi, Willoughby is pretty good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:33 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just go to to Willoughby & Co for Sushi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck the other frauds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:29:56 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW Tzeitel, if you’re looking for a proper sushi place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometime, I’d also recommend Minato’s -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g312659-d1118597-Reviews-Minato-Cape_Town_Central_Western_Cape.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The food is excellent, but the service is a little...odd.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The waitress (who I think is the chef’s wife) told us that we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn’t know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we were doing with the orders and that she’d just bring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chef decided to make.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you might be better off with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.capetownmagazine.com/takumi. Well, better decor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyway.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I dunno if there are any other places in Cape Town where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can actually get a real sushi chef doing the stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:16 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not yet, give me time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14 Jan 2014 14:02, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From the name I assumed it would be nsfw.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:02 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *lol* The Nic!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Very entertaining :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:42 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://youtu.be/ZqFl_e1WOGA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They could have saved themselves the embarrassment and just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the beginning.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have they fixed the issue with the civilians losing the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plot?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I was playing till nearly 11pm. You could have just sent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me a message via
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Steam Chat.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Noone saw this coming...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.simcity.com/en_US/blog/article/simcity-offline-is-coming
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:46 AM, lindsey kiviets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Gb you missing out man. KOF matches are intensifying
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> online.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> scumbag ilitrit says we must play on dolphin, doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show up to get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> beat.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:42:54 +0200
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Oh yes. Wow, sorry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Yeah, I saw that on TFG.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> We all know that this is going to suck though. Even if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is directed by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> the Ong Bak guy, it would probably just be a "wow cool
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fight scene"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> movie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> that with Tekken- characters that don't follow the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proper story... at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> If the other Tekken movie was called BloodSport 2099 or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> probably wouldn't hate it as much.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Even the CGI Tekken movie was absurd. I don't get it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Ilitirit Sama
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> He's referring to her seismo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> New Tekken movie by Ong Bak director.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-01-13-theres-a-new-tekken-movie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:38 PM, G B <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> She has a command throw?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Not that I need a command throw to turn her into a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grappler ;-p
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On 13 Jan 2014 19:39, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Imagine you're playing as Shen when picking C.Viper...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> more...Benimaru...and K'... and Daimon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On 13 Jan 2014 18:15, "G B" <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> That is what you told me since you met me. Play Sakura,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cammy or Viper.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Ugh, those feints look like a bother to do but hey, I'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give her a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> proper
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> bash. Should be fun.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> First ten second of the video looks like fun.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Was watching this guy Zeny53's Elf... LOL. The guy is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the best.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> @GB:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I really think you would enjoy C.Viper in SSFIV. She's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really cheap and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> her pressure game is kinda like what a KOF character
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXFonlAPlWw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =========================================================================
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Access to this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heading "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions or advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> member firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinating entity for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International provides no services to clients. Each member
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International is a legally distinct and separate entity and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each describes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as such. Information about the structure and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction of your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Access to this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heading "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions or advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> member firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinating entity for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International provides no services to clients. Each member
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International is a legally distinct and separate entity and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each describes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as such. Information about the structure and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction of your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Access to this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heading "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions or advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> member firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinating entity for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International provides no services to clients. Each member
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International is a legally distinct and separate entity and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each describes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as such. Information about the structure and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction of your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Access to this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heading "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions or advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> member firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinating entity for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International provides no services to clients. Each member
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International is a legally distinct and separate entity and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each describes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as such. Information about the structure and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction of your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Access to this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication in error, please address with the subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heading "Received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disclosure,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions or advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the official business of the firm are neither given nor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> member firm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ("KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coordinating entity for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International provides no services to clients. Each member
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International is a legally distinct and separate entity and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each describes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself as such. Information about the structure and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction of your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been swept by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
