Hello everyone! I'm Kay (a male Kay, which sometimes confuses people who think that all Kays are female), and I've been having fun with fractals and chaos ever since I read the Scientific American article on the Mandelbrot set by A K Dewdney back in August 1985. First, I want to say that I really like Chaoscope. The only thing that I'd put on my wishlist for it would be some kind of scripting language (like the Fractint formula interpreter) so that new functions could be added easily. Of course they wouldn't run as fast as compiled code would, but it would at least be handy for prototyping. I know that it would take a lot of work, so I'm not expecting it to happen any time soon :) I'm using Chaoscope on an AMD Athlon 64 X2 dual-core 3800+ running at 2GHz with 2Gb of RAM, and a Radeon X1300 graphics card, which makes things very nice and fast for me. A few things I've noticed: maybe bugs, maybe not. I just thought I should mention them. 1) It doesn't seem possible to set the View Width and Height to arbitrary values by entering them in the fields. For example, if I type in "300" to Width, it changes to "296"; "295" changes to "288", and so on. If there isn't a strong reason for restricting the values, I'd respectfully say that that is a bug :) 2) The largest number of iterations that I can set is 4294967295. I know I'm lucky that I have a fast machine, but truly that sometimes isn't enough iterations to eliminate all the "noise" in Solid Render mode, and often represents only about an hour of rendering time. Could there be some way to make the maximum number of iterations larger for those of us who can afford them? 3) This is somewhat hard to describe, so please bear with me. If I render an attractor in Solid mode, and then switch to Plasma or Light mode and re-render, it seems that the gradients are not applied correctly. Instead of the normal 'rainbow' appearance expected from the default Speed gradient, the image is rendered in shades of pink through white, and sometimes with a sharply demarcated band of a quite saturated red. Usually, moving the image does NOT fix the problem, though Adjusting the view or changing any of the parameter values will. Opening a new speed gradient, or Reversing the gradient also does not fix the problem either. 4) Could the new version please not keep restoring things to their default values? For example, if I've set up colours in Solid mode, and then switch to Plasma, and then back to Solid, my colours have been reset to the defaults. Also (this may make no sense, and if it doesn't I apologise) if, say, I have values set up for P0, P1 and P2 for a Polynomial Type A, and then I change to Polynomial Type B, could it please keep the existing values of P0, P1 and P2, and just zero the values of P3, P4 and P5? I think this would be particularly handy for things like IFS, where you can change the number of matrices - I keep having to write down the 'old' values of the components to type them in again when I investigate the effect of adding in a new matrix. Oh dear, this sounds as though I'm complaining! Truly, I'm not - just telling you what I've found and what I think, based on a few weeks' experimentation with Chaoscope. Maybe others have said the same before, and if so, I apologise for repeating :) If any of you are LiveJournalers, I'm "mhw" there. And if people would like to see what I've been doing, I have a small gallery of Chaoscope images at http://pics.livejournal.com/mhw/gallery/0000wf81?.view=grid Happy Chaos to you all! Kay ___________________________________________________________ What kind of emailer are you? Find out today - get a free analysis of your email personality. Take the quiz at the Yahoo! Mail Championship. http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://mail.yahoo.net/uk =====================================================The Chaoscope mailing-list Archives : //www.freelists.org/archives/chaoscope Admin contact : chaoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Web site : http://www.chaoscope.org =====================================================