[cad-linux] Re: editing with this file format

  • From: phrostie <pfrostie@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 09:57:36 -0700 (PDT)

no, i'd put in a request with a project that was a off shoot of povray to 
add a sketch feature similar to that of bmrt, but the feature was never
developed.

i think the transform approach is correct.  but you are correct that some form
of HLR/line type mod will be needed.

--- Lee Harding <lee.harding@> wrote:
> Phrostie,=20
> 
> Have you tried daisy-chaining together something like:
> 
> - povray in two bit or grayscale mode, piped to...
> - autotrace or another raster to vector converter
> 
> Obviously not an industrial strength system, but it would get the idea
> across to peeps.  The result would be imprecise in size/position but the
> quality of the hidden line removal should be good.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: phrostie [mailto:pfrostie@xxxxxxxxx]=20
> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 6:11 PM
> To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cad-linux] Re: editing with this file format
> 
> having used rendering software to create a photorealistic scene from a
> 3D rib=20
> file.  i want to use the same concepts create a utility that would
> "render" a=20
> view from the 3D scene is to a 2D drawing based on the location,
> direction,=20
> and attributes of a plan(camera). =20
> 
> unlike most of you, i have not gotten far enough along to have any proof
> of=20
> concept.  infact i'm still working on how to build a crude modeler to=20
> impliment this.  the examples in the book make it look easy, then just
> try=20
> doing something with it. :-\
> 
> in the basic case it would be simple.  the basic views(plan, top,
> bottom,=20
> left and right) would be created by taking one of the major axis and
> reducing=20
> it to zero.  then converting it to something like dxf.  where multipule
> views=20
> can be detailed and demensioned.  as time goes on more advanced features
> 
> would need to be added.  the ability to render isometric views, auxilery
> 
> views, section views, section cuts, and filtering
> 
> the advange is that it would not matter who's modeler or who's drafting=20
> package we use.  as long as they work within the unix philosiphy. =20
> "each tool does one thing" and they all work together.
> 
> i could use a opencascade based modeler built with TK/TCL to model my 3D
> and=20
> pythoncad or qcad to detail it.  those that want their 3D managed by a=20
> database could do that then export the scenes for detailing.
> 
> i'm rather determined that dxf would be a roseta stone.  even though we
> may=20
> all want a common open format, we still have a real world we have to
> live=20
> within.  just about everyone from catia to unigraphics can read a dxf.
> 
> On Sunday 07 September 2003 18:47, you wrote:
> > phrostie <pfrostie@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > formats like dxf although 3d are better suited for 2D and Drawings.
> > >
> > > why not make a link between the two?
> >
> > The target is attractive but what would such a link look like?
> 
> --=20
> Oh i've slipped the surly bonds of DOS=20
> and danced the skies on Linux silvered wings.
> http://pfrostie.freeservers.com/cad-tastrafy/
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/cad-linux
> 
> 


=====
phrostie
Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of DOS
and danced the skies on Linux silvered wings.
http://pfrostie.freeservers.com/cad-tastrafy/
//www.freelists.org/webpage/cad-linux

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

Other related posts: