no, i'd put in a request with a project that was a off shoot of povray to add a sketch feature similar to that of bmrt, but the feature was never developed. i think the transform approach is correct. but you are correct that some form of HLR/line type mod will be needed. --- Lee Harding <lee.harding@> wrote: > Phrostie,=20 > > Have you tried daisy-chaining together something like: > > - povray in two bit or grayscale mode, piped to... > - autotrace or another raster to vector converter > > Obviously not an industrial strength system, but it would get the idea > across to peeps. The result would be imprecise in size/position but the > quality of the hidden line removal should be good. > > -----Original Message----- > From: phrostie [mailto:pfrostie@xxxxxxxxx]=20 > Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 6:11 PM > To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [cad-linux] Re: editing with this file format > > having used rendering software to create a photorealistic scene from a > 3D rib=20 > file. i want to use the same concepts create a utility that would > "render" a=20 > view from the 3D scene is to a 2D drawing based on the location, > direction,=20 > and attributes of a plan(camera). =20 > > unlike most of you, i have not gotten far enough along to have any proof > of=20 > concept. infact i'm still working on how to build a crude modeler to=20 > impliment this. the examples in the book make it look easy, then just > try=20 > doing something with it. :-\ > > in the basic case it would be simple. the basic views(plan, top, > bottom,=20 > left and right) would be created by taking one of the major axis and > reducing=20 > it to zero. then converting it to something like dxf. where multipule > views=20 > can be detailed and demensioned. as time goes on more advanced features > > would need to be added. the ability to render isometric views, auxilery > > views, section views, section cuts, and filtering > > the advange is that it would not matter who's modeler or who's drafting=20 > package we use. as long as they work within the unix philosiphy. =20 > "each tool does one thing" and they all work together. > > i could use a opencascade based modeler built with TK/TCL to model my 3D > and=20 > pythoncad or qcad to detail it. those that want their 3D managed by a=20 > database could do that then export the scenes for detailing. > > i'm rather determined that dxf would be a roseta stone. even though we > may=20 > all want a common open format, we still have a real world we have to > live=20 > within. just about everyone from catia to unigraphics can read a dxf. > > On Sunday 07 September 2003 18:47, you wrote: > > phrostie <pfrostie@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > formats like dxf although 3d are better suited for 2D and Drawings. > > > > > > why not make a link between the two? > > > > The target is attractive but what would such a link look like? > > --=20 > Oh i've slipped the surly bonds of DOS=20 > and danced the skies on Linux silvered wings. > http://pfrostie.freeservers.com/cad-tastrafy/ > //www.freelists.org/webpage/cad-linux > > ===== phrostie Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of DOS and danced the skies on Linux silvered wings. http://pfrostie.freeservers.com/cad-tastrafy/ //www.freelists.org/webpage/cad-linux __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com