[bookport] Re: bookport improvements
- From: "Gary Wunder" <gwunder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:44:50 -0600
I agree. I have a fine battery charger and don't want to be tied
to another chord to do my reading.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Carter" <r-carter@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 7:42 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport improvements
Hi All,
I have to come onboard as supporting keeping the BookPort battery
system
just the way it is. It works great!
Robert Carter
At 12:45 AM 12/13/2004, you wrote:
>Hi Aman and list:
>
>You are quite right. The last thing I want is another
proprietary charger to
>keep track of. It's proprietariness defeats its convenience, in
my own
>humble opinion. This is my big complaint with all devices,
regardless of
>their manufactorer. They all include a charger, which is
proprietary.
>
>I also enjoyed Jerry's informative post on this subject. It was
written with
>a lot of useful details in a language anyone should be able to
grasp. I
>regret that I didn't have the time to do this.
>
>Cheers,
>Dave
Other related posts: