[bookport] Re: bookport improvements
- From: "Marlaina Lieberg" <marlaina@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:12:52 -0800
Couldn't agree more!! Please keep it simple and easy to use, with
portability being first and foremost!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Carter" <r-carter@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 5:42 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport improvements
> Hi All,
>
> I have to come onboard as supporting keeping the BookPort battery system
> just the way it is. It works great!
>
> Robert Carter
>
> At 12:45 AM 12/13/2004, you wrote:
> >Hi Aman and list:
> >
> >You are quite right. The last thing I want is another proprietary charger
to
> >keep track of. It's proprietariness defeats its convenience, in my own
> >humble opinion. This is my big complaint with all devices, regardless of
> >their manufactorer. They all include a charger, which is proprietary.
> >
> >I also enjoyed Jerry's informative post on this subject. It was written
with
> >a lot of useful details in a language anyone should be able to grasp. I
> >regret that I didn't have the time to do this.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Dave
>
>
>
>
> __________ NOD32 1.946 (20041213) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.nod32.com
>
>
Other related posts:
