>I would surmise that this would only be an additional setting in the menus so >people could take it or leave it. In any case, in the endpoint, it would be >up to APH to include this or not. Julia. >I wouldn't want a bass cut. Different strokes ... > >Mike > >On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Julia Cosgrove (Mrs.) wrote: > >>Hello Phil >> >>I tend to use Keith at about 60 and frequency 8 as my default voice as he is >>less bassy than the rest through my headphones. I quite like Perfect Paul >>but he is a bit bassy. I wonder if APH might consider a bass cut in a future >>firmware? Of course, different people have different listening preferences. >> >>Julia. >> >>> I have had my book port now for three years plus and I am pleased with >>> some features and wonder about some others. Obviously the navigation in a >>> plain text book is just wonderful and even in an audio book is not bad. The >>> transferring of material from the book port manager to ones unit is even >>> strait forward enough for a computer neophyte like my self. I think I would >>> give book port a passing grade if I was ask to. >>> >>> My only complaint would be the speech engine and I have even gotten kind >>> of use to that. I do however wonder about the two voices, I think they are >>> called something like, repeating Robert and echo Eddy, you know the ones. >>> Only difference I see in them is ones digital repeat is a little faster >>> then the other. I suppose my question is just this, does anyone really use >>> either of these voices to read material? >>> I have settled on perfect Paul at around pitch 65 that seams to be best >>> for Me to understand. I would be curious as to what voices others use and >>> at what pitch. >>> >>> Thanks for your indulgence, an old curmudgeon who's name is, Phil Parr. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.5/177 - Release Date: 21/11/05