Hello, No doubt on this one!!!!! I did write a post on just this subject a good while ago, but it was blown off. No problem, if the bop people don't do it, I think that the competition will. Otto -----Original Message----- From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Edick Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 6:44 PM To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookport] Re: Just a couple of comments. I would be for some sort of tone controlls, maybe even at least a five band equalizer for. Real handy while playing mp3 files, and would help with fine tuning doubletalk for those who want to. /David -----Original Message----- From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Freeman Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:08 PM To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookport] Re: Just a couple of comments. I wouldn't want a bass cut. Different strokes ... Mike On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Julia Cosgrove (Mrs.) wrote: > Hello Phil > > I tend to use Keith at about 60 and frequency 8 as my default voice as > he is less bassy than the rest through my headphones. I quite like Perfect Paul but he is a bit bassy. I wonder if APH might consider a bass cut in a future firmware? Of course, different people have different listening preferences. > > Julia. > >> I have had my book port now for three years plus and I am pleased with some features and wonder about some others. Obviously the navigation in a plain text book is just wonderful and even in an audio book is not bad. The transferring of material from the book port manager to ones unit is even strait forward enough for a computer neophyte like my self. I think I would give book port a passing grade if I was ask to. >> >> My only complaint would be the speech engine and I have even gotten kind of use to that. I do however wonder about the two voices, I think they are called something like, repeating Robert and echo Eddy, you know the ones. Only difference I see in them is ones digital repeat is a little faster then the other. I suppose my question is just this, does anyone really use either of these voices to read material? >> I have settled on perfect Paul at around pitch 65 that seams to be >> best for Me to understand. I would be curious as to what voices others use and at what pitch. >> >> Thanks for your indulgence, an old curmudgeon who's name is, Phil Parr. > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/176 - Release Date: > 20/11/05 > > > >