[bookport] Re: Just a couple of comments.

  • From: "Otto Zamora" <8zamora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:14:34 -0500

Hello,

No doubt on this one!!!!!
I did write a post on just this subject a good while ago, but it was blown
off.
No problem, if the bop people don't do it, I think that the competition
will.

Otto 

-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of David Edick
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 6:44 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Just a couple of comments.

I would be for some sort of tone controlls, maybe even at least a five band
equalizer  for. Real handy while playing mp3 files, and would help with fine
tuning doubletalk for those who want to.

/David 

-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mike Freeman
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:08 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Just a couple of comments.

I wouldn't want a bass cut. Different strokes ...

Mike

On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Julia Cosgrove (Mrs.) wrote:

> Hello Phil
>
> I tend to use Keith at about 60 and frequency 8 as my default voice as 
> he
is less bassy than the rest through my headphones.  I quite like Perfect
Paul but he is a bit bassy.  I wonder if APH might consider a bass cut in a
future firmware?  Of course, different people have different listening
preferences.
>
> Julia.
>
>>     I have had my book port now for three years plus and I am pleased
with some features and wonder about some others. Obviously the navigation in
a plain text book is just wonderful and even in an audio book is not bad.
The transferring of material from the book port manager to ones unit is even
strait forward enough for a computer neophyte like my self. I think I would
give book port a passing grade if I was ask to.
>>
>>   My only complaint would be the speech engine and I have even gotten
kind of use to that. I do however wonder about the two voices, I think they
are called something like, repeating Robert and echo Eddy, you know the
ones. Only difference I see in them is ones digital repeat is a little
faster then the other. I suppose my question is just this, does anyone
really use either of these voices to read material?
>>   I have settled on perfect Paul at around pitch 65 that seams to be 
>> best
for Me to understand. I would be curious as to what voices others use and at
what pitch.
>>
>>   Thanks for your indulgence, an old curmudgeon who's name is, Phil Parr.
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/176 - Release Date: 
> 20/11/05
>
>
>
>







Other related posts: