For me, I think I would have rather it took regular batteries. If it would have needed to be a bit bigger for that, that's fine with me. Smaller is not always better. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Toews" <dogriver@xxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 11:40 AM Subject: [bookport] Re: I wasn't impressed. > The battery thing seems to be the biggest hang-up for people. What > interests me is that a lot of the people who are very concerned about > the batteries are the same people who wanted the unit to be as small as > it possibly could be. Unfortunately, to those people, you can't have it > both ways. If you make the unit too small to hold standard batteries, > one of the side effects of this reduction in size is, oddly, that it > can't hold standard batteries. > > Bruce > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:06:54 -0700, "Lois Goodine" <al419@xxxxxxxxxxx> > said: > > I agree with Bruce. In some ways I like the present BP better than > > anything. > > But I can understand the thinking for some of the changes coming and BP2 > > will be > > great! Personally I really like using the double A batteries. When I > > use them > > only for reading text, I can get 90 hours out of them! And I really > > don't mind > > Double talk. I thought I would at first. But like Larry said, you get > > too > > interested in what you're reading to care about it. And Double talk does > > have > > some not too bad inflection. > > Lois Goodine. > > > > > > -- > Bruce Toews > E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: dogriver@xxxxxxxx > Website: http://www.ogts.net > Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net > Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com > >