[bookport] Re: I wasn't impressed.
- From: "PAMELA RADER" <PRADER@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:46:59 -0500
We will continue to support the old one or current Book Port until parts
run out. We can't make anymore changes to this one, because we've
reached the limit on what we can do to it and parts are either being
obsoleted or too expensive to obtain and would raise the price.
The reason for the Design Change on the battery is that the new Book
Port will be thinner and regular batteries won't fit into it.
Pamela Rader, TECHNICAL SUPPORT
American Printing House For The Blind
1839 Frankfort Ave.
Louisville, KY 40206
PHONE: 1-800-223-1839, Ext. 307
>>> rustys.lists@xxxxxxxxx 03/14/07 11:25AM >>>
I didn't hear any commentary about how long they would support it,
just that they would. The deal with APH is that they don't do all the
fixes themselves.
When I had to get the USB plug fixed on mine they had to send it back
to Springer I'm guessing. It wasn't cheap either! I think they
replaced the board $125.00
I got the idea that, though there are changes, there are many things
about the bookport which will be the same. Lary mentioned that the
footprint is the same size, same keypad. Same speech chip. they're
choosing a special battery because, Lary said, it works best with
bookport. It seems like they may be using some of the same internal
architecture. I don't know that to be the case, but it seems like
they're sooping up the old BP with things which can be taken advantage
of in the future.As I understand it, they've run out of internal
memory for firmware on BP 1. That seems like something which they're
working on. It seems like SD is being used because CF is getting more
expensive.
So, it seems like they're taking a good thing and just making it
better, not redesigning it from the ground up.
Rusty
On 3/14/07, Robert Acosta <boacosta@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But how long will APH support Bookport 1? I understood that they
would do
> so as long as they had the parts. Am I correct here?
> Robert Acosta
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: lana
> To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 3:51 AM
> Subject: [bookport] Re: I wasn't impressed.
>
>
> I'm not so down. Am disapointed they won't have overdrive at
first. Will
> wait till they do; otherwise it's too much like what I already have.
> Consolation for Suzanne.
> I'm staying openminded on the batteries. The speach isn't a big
issue. I
> may still prefer external speakers, but it will be nice not to have
to mess
> with headphones when I want to check something quick.
> I was a lot more impressed with the icon braille than I had
expected.
> Let's all wait till the real thing comes out and some of the bugs
are
> worked out before becoming supercritics.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Phil Parr
> To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 3:20 AM
> Subject: [bookport] I wasn't impressed.
>
>
> Well, I listened to main minue last night on a c b radio and I
was
> singularly disappointed. We will still have that same old speech
program
> and, really not much more. Yes a stereo mike and the ability to
change the
> recording settings but, I herd nothing about a line in jack.
> The charging set up will be different but I really don't see
that as
> an improvement. With book port one you can get some rechargeable
double ayes
> and just change them when you need to. With the new one you half to
by a
> proprietary battery from the printing house or leave your computer on
while
> the unit charges. Yes one can plug it in to an a c outlet but, if
your in an
> airport that is out of the question.
> Did I get the wrong impression or is the new one upgradeable
just
> like the old one or what.
> Think I will just limp along with my old one and wait for book
port
> three.
>
> Phil Parr.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.10/720 - Release Date:
3/12/2007
> 7:19 PM
>
Other related posts:
