[bookport] Re: Daisy Vs BRF with Bookshare
- From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:27:54 -0500
I'm curious about the advantages of using Kurzweil to load the books
over the Book Port Transfer program.
>>> n0oxy@xxxxxxxxxxx Thursday, November 10, 2005 7:29:38 PM >>>
I always get the daisy version. However, I open all of the files in
kurzweil
1000, and use that product to load the files in to the book port. If
you are
using the book port transfer software, the best choice may be
different.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Allen" <wd8ldy@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 4:33 PM
Subject: [bookport] Daisy Vs BRF with Bookshare
> Hi list!
>
> Trying to assist someone with a decision to buy a bookport. They are
members
> of Bookshare. I recall seeing some discussion on this list about
using brf
> was better than Daisy format, but since regulations prevent my
membership
in
> bookshare considerably, I didn't pay much attention when it came up.
Looked
> in the Bookport manual but don't see any discussion of this in the
bookshare
> section. Can someone point me to an explanation of this issue?
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
> David Allen
> Independent Adaptive Technology Consulting at reasonable rates
>
> 115-A Musselburgh Rise
> Dunedin 9001
> New Zealand
> Telephone: +64-(03)455-7694
> Mobile: +64-(021)079-6006
> Email: wd8ldy@xxxxxxxxxx
>
Other related posts:
