[bksvol-discuss] Re: should validators be required to read through the whole book?
- From: "Katie Star" <kaitlyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:00:45 -0700
E,
In many ways there is no way any of the guidelines can really be checked.
How does one know if all the page breaks are there or if a good spell
checking has been done.
The greatest problem in communication is the illusion that it has been
accomplished.
- George Bernard Shaw
Katie Hill
Noone is given a dream without also being given the power to make it come
true.
Find your freedom at:
WWW.838gold.com
Kaitlyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of E.
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:30 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] should validators be required to read through the
whole book?
There is no way of knowing if a validator reads through the whole book. So
I cannot understand how this could be made a requirement.
E.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
Other related posts:
