[bksvol-discuss] kurzweil vs. finereader
- From: Pam Quinn <quinns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 01:01:32 -0600
Well I must say though I love Kurzweil's editing features, I'm
sticking to finereader for scanning. I just don't understand this. But
following is an example of the cover of Sea Star, (I plan to replace
the fair copy in the collection), and this was scanned with Kurzweil,
finereader 7, optimized. Before it was optimized, it said the page was
blank. Once optimized, this is what I got:
¦ V...1**' .14
I
mm
Misty is leaving them!
h ^Mwr^^wk^oved horse that Paul and Maureen have
loved since srSfe was'a tiny filly They IcnowtMisty is leaving
|to be the star of a moviei But it's almost too hardlj^fee*
jher go. What will they do without Misty? '-'.'^jmk
^ Then one day the children find a' lone colt with a
crooked star on his forehead. Beside him lies his mother
How Paul and Maureen fight to save the life of little
^Sea Star makes a story you'll never forget.? "4"^^^^^^
SCHOLASTIC BOOK SfRVICES
NEW YORK LONDON RICHMOND HILL, ONTARIO
mwSWSK&h
Okay now, here is the cover again using my Finereader 6 with only the
settings that I always use, no adjusting or anything:
Misty is leaving them!
Misty?the beloved horse that Paul and Maureen have loved since she was
a tiny filly They know Misty is leaving to be the star of a movie. But
it's almost too hard to see her go. What will they do without Misty?
Then one day the children find a' lone colt with a crooked star on his
forehead. Beside him lies his mother ?dead.
How Paul and Maureen fight to save the life of little Sea Star makes a
story you'll never forget.
SCHOLASTIC BOOK SERVICES
NiW YORK ? LONDON ? RICHMOND HIU, ONTARIO
I just don't get it. How is it that the scan in Finereader 6 comes out
better than using Finereader 7 within Kurzweil? Just doesn't make
sense to me.
Pam
Other related posts:
