[bksvol-discuss] Re: Submission formats are barriers to validation
- From: "Julie Morales" <inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 14:45:31 -0700
Hi, Tiffany. I don't know if submitting two copies of a book would be a good
idea. If someone were to validate one, and it was waiting for approval by
the administration, someone else could get the other copy and validate it if
that other copy hadn't been rejected. I think it would just be easier, and
provide less of a chance of duplicates, if there was just one copy of each
book on the Downloads page. Sure, the person validating one copy could just
reject the other, but if they happened to forget...well, there you go.
*smile* My own personal opinion, anyway. Take care.
Julie Morales
Email and Windows/MSN Messenger:
inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
If your dog is fat, you aren't getting enough exercise. --Unknown
The reason a dog has so many friends is that he wags his tail instead of his
tongue. --Anonymous
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tiffany H. Jessen" <tjessen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 7:39 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Submission formats are barriers to validation
Now that I know people prefer files in rtf, I will use that instead of kes.
I believe there are four or five books I've submitted almost a month ago in
kes. They're already pretty well edited, but have not been validated yet.
As that I still have the original kes file, I don't mind saving and
resubmitting them in rtf so they can get through faster, but I thought
having two copies on the validation page might create too much clutter. I
am not a validater, so don't know how a lot of that background stuff works.
Should I bother? or not?
Sorry for so many dopy inquiries recently.
And thanks.
Tiff
----- Original Message -----
From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 10:12 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Submission formats are barriers to validation
> If you have the proper software to read Kes or Arc my understanding is
that
> you can improve the scan if folks keep their images. In practice, this
> means a very Kes file to upload.
>
> Some folks upload a book in two formats, one Kes or Arc, and the second
> time in the .rtf form. This does mean double submissions on the step 1
> page but also leads to greater flexibility in who can download the book.
>
> E.
Other related posts:
