Now that I know people prefer files in rtf, I will use that instead of kes. I believe there are four or five books I've submitted almost a month ago in kes. They're already pretty well edited, but have not been validated yet. As that I still have the original kes file, I don't mind saving and resubmitting them in rtf so they can get through faster, but I thought having two copies on the validation page might create too much clutter. I am not a validater, so don't know how a lot of that background stuff works. Should I bother? or not? Sorry for so many dopy inquiries recently. And thanks. Tiff ----- Original Message ----- From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 10:12 AM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Submission formats are barriers to validation > If you have the proper software to read Kes or Arc my understanding is that > you can improve the scan if folks keep their images. In practice, this > means a very Kes file to upload. > > Some folks upload a book in two formats, one Kes or Arc, and the second > time in the .rtf form. This does mean double submissions on the step 1 > page but also leads to greater flexibility in who can download the book. > > E.