I'd like the stripper to go as well. I take out headings, but leave page numbers in for books I submit. A little thing like a page number doesn't distract from reading, IMO, and it can be such a necessary piece of information to have! It was always an annoyance with braille books that the numbers didn't match with the ones in the print edition, so I really do appreciate having page numbers in tact on Bookshare. Just another two cents worth. :) Joanie ----- Original Message ----- From: "robert tweedy" <rtweedy2@xxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 8:20 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Lose the stripper! > I agree, in fact take a look of one of the new books Desperate measures and > you will see that the stripper didn't get all the headers because sometimes > the OCR programs put the headers further down at the top. If customers don't > want headers and bookshare makes that a requirement that before a book is > submitted for final aproval, all headers must be stripped. This would assure > the headers would be gone any way and yes even if the headers at the top of > pages are entirely correct, they should be gone anyway. As far as chapters > go though, that could be a minor convience since they don't turn out > sometimes. Just my two sense worth, will go with the guidelines of > bookshare. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 6:01 PM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Lose the stripper! > > > > Let's scrap it. I leave in page numbers and breaks but take out the > > author's name and the title at the top of pages carefully letter by letter > > as I go. The messiness at the top makes bookshare books come across as > > messy output. > > > > I think we can learn to do this well so the stripper is not necessary. > > Obsessing about it means validating books takes much too long as witness > > the discussion on the list. If we can get the ocr package people to get > > the remove headers to work that would be good. What is the judgement > > about the one in version 9? > > > > E. > > > > > > > > > > > >