As an idea for a topic for a 10-minute presentation to technical writers, Stuart wrote: > regular expressions (Amongst many other applications, regular expressions are what you can use in Word's Find and Replace dialog box when you choose its "Use wildcards" option -- you can then type an expression like [0-9]{1,} to mean "find one or more digits".) I don't think many TWs would get much out of 10 minutes about regular expressions, as the topic can quickly become pretty complex. (For that matter, I think many people would struggle on a full-day course!) However, maybe one thing that a 10-minute presentation could do is show people how quickly a task could be finished by using a certain technique, such as regular expressions. Then the audience might be more motivated to find out later exactly how it could help _them_. So I reckon this "groktalk" theme (i.e. micro-presentations) ties in with the Beyond Bullet Points book (mentioned recently) -- fairly detailed written information could back up each presentation so that the audience can make more sense of the topic later. > FrameMaker ...basic concepts would more than take > care of the infamous FrameMaker learning curve Yes, I think a solid grounding would go a long way, but FrameMaker is still a big program, and it's unlikely that you'd use all of it (eg TOC setup, building-blocks for numbering, dictionary-style headers) very often, so I believe it still takes a long time to learn. (We tend to forget how long familiar programs took us to learn, but I reckon most take several months of intensive use, if not more. I'm talking about "grokking" (immersive understanding) not just basic usage -- the latter would normally take only around 30 minutes, say.) As I said in the "Word to Frame" thread back at the start of Feb, much of the problem many people have when they start using FrameMaker is the unfamiliar terminology and UI -- the _concepts_ are familiar, but not how they're done or even what they're called! 10 minutes from a knowledgeable FrameMaker user would go a long way to removing those barriers. > Any other suggestions? Honestly, 10 minutes of expert's tips on using _any_ TW's tool (not least Word!) would be good. The norm seems to be that people learn on the job, so they might never discover the options or other tricks that could make their life so much easier. Come to think of it, I think there are probably more tips to know about _any_ tool than could be presented in 10 minutes. Maybe the key is the _intensity_ of the presentation, which a 10-minute limit tends to increase. An intense 30-minute presentation of insider's tips might be more realistic than restricting the talk to 10 minutes. What do ASTC committee members think of using some micro-presentations in their conferences or meetings? I'm not thinking of the whole agenda going that way, but it would help to vary the pace and to present topics that might otherwise not fit. Finding presenters might be more challenging, but some of the existing presenters might take on some of the topics, and a micro-presentation is less onerous for additional presenters and the audience alike. What do you think? Regards, Craig ===== My e-mail address is: ===== craigh(at)attachesoftware(dot)com ===== (I may not see messages sent to my Yahoo address) Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com ************************************************** To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field. To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field. To search the austechwriter archives, go to www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter To contact the list administrator, send a message to austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx **************************************************