[audio-pals] Re: Response to Tom's Audio Letter
- From: Thomas McMahan <thomas.mcmahan@xxxxxxx>
- To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 08:38:12 -0500
audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Mar 17, 2015, at 8:17 AM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> What is the address to post to the group?
>
> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 8:36 AM
> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Response to Tom's Audio Letter
>
> Well you’ve been approved, so it will be interesting to see if your mail
> works over there.
>
> Just looked into a group that I’m supposed to be a moderator of in
> Yahoogroups, it’s still a mess over there. Yahoo groups that is. Well the
> group itself isn’t in the greatest shape either, but it hasn’t been for a
> long time *lol*.
>
>> On Mar 17, 2015, at 7:23 AM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> I’m not in any rush. I just wanted to let you know since I had said I would
>> get subscribed sometime last night. I had remembered you saying that you do
>> not get notified.
>>
>> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 7:41 AM
>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Response to Tom's Audio Letter
>>
>> Okay, haven’t been over there yet, obviously it doesn’t notify via e-mail,
>> that is a big knock against it. Am checking out some other places today
>> too. Cubic.org <http://cubic.org/> etc. E-lists too, although I’m not sure
>> about administrative controls in that server too, looks like just anybody
>> could roam in there. Cubic at least lets you quarantine first message to
>> see if someone is legit first. Will probably still keep exploring,
>> somewhere there has to be a place that is a happy balance. Haven’t been to
>> yahoo groups for several months, and I still have a group over there, maybe
>> I should go over there and see if anything has changed to the better.
>> Probably not though because I keep seeing groups moving.
>>
>>> On Mar 17, 2015, at 6:33 AM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I sent a request to subscribe this morning.
>>>
>>> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan
>>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:45 PM
>>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Response to Tom's Audio Letter
>>>
>>> Actually it’s the other way around, groups that get mail from gmail the
>>> originator will not see their post, especially with yahoo groups, not sure
>>> about google groups though. Just tested using GMX accounts and saw what I
>>> posted. There are some other accessibility problems that are being ran
>>> into though, so not sure yet how viable of an option it actually would be.
>>> Might have to explore farther afield, and we may not find a place that
>>> doesn’t have these kinds of limits.
>>>
>>> Yeah over at missives it was really bad for BethAnn, she was cut out of the
>>> loop entirely. IT was a little dicy with frilliest too, but it seemed to
>>> work better faster, although it still redacts her mail.
>>>
>>> Well it’s open for experimentation for now, but so far mixed results.
>>>
>>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I had said I do not see any reason to not go ahead and try the other group
>>>> through Google. The only concerns I had were the fact that it took a while
>>>> for Bethann to see my mail and I to see her mail when we first changed.
>>>> Even after we got it straightened out some what there for a while Bethann
>>>> still was not seeing a lot of my mail unless someone else responded to it
>>>> first. I do not know why that it was like that. I think I am going to have
>>>> to get use to not seeing my own mail, I have heard that if you are on a
>>>> Google group then When you send mail you do not see your own unless you
>>>> follow specific steps to enable that. Other than the concern that we will
>>>> start having problems like we have in previous moves everything else seems
>>>> like a positive thing to bring the group back to one group instead of
>>>> their being a divide in the group.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan
>>>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 1:37 AM
>>>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Response to Tom's Audio Letter
>>>>
>>>> I don’t think so, no to this point in the timeline at least.
>>>> Am reading mail from oldest to newest, or for Danny’s benefit eldest to
>>>> most youngerly.
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 8:32 PM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey I did not see my response come through, did it come through?
Other related posts:
