[audio-pals] Re: Response to Tom's Audio Letter
- From: "Josh" <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:33:06 -0400
I sent a request to subscribe this morning.
From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:45 PM
To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Response to Tom's Audio Letter
Actually it’s the other way around, groups that get mail from gmail the
originator will not see their post, especially with yahoo groups, not sure
about google groups though. Just tested using GMX accounts and saw what I
posted. There are some other accessibility problems that are being ran into
though, so not sure yet how viable of an option it actually would be. Might
have to explore farther afield, and we may not find a place that doesn’t have
these kinds of limits.
Yeah over at missives it was really bad for BethAnn, she was cut out of the
loop entirely. IT was a little dicy with frilliest too, but it seemed to work
better faster, although it still redacts her mail.
Well it’s open for experimentation for now, but so far mixed results.
On Mar 16, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I had said I do not see any reason to not go ahead and try the other group
through Google. The only concerns I had were the fact that it took a while for
Bethann to see my mail and I to see her mail when we first changed. Even after
we got it straightened out some what there for a while Bethann still was not
seeing a lot of my mail unless someone else responded to it first. I do not
know why that it was like that. I think I am going to have to get use to not
seeing my own mail, I have heard that if you are on a Google group then When
you send mail you do not see your own unless you follow specific steps to
enable that. Other than the concern that we will start having problems like we
have in previous moves everything else seems like a positive thing to bring the
group back to one group instead of their being a divide in the group.
From: <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[ <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 1:37 AM
To: <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Response to Tom's Audio Letter
I don’t think so, no to this point in the timeline at least.
Am reading mail from oldest to newest, or for Danny’s benefit eldest to most
youngerly.
On Mar 15, 2015, at 8:32 PM, Josh < <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>
lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey I did not see my response come through, did it come through?
Other related posts:
