[audio-pals] Re: Response to Tom's Audio Letter
- From: Thomas McMahan <thomas.mcmahan@xxxxxxx>
- To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:35:47 -0500
Well you’ve been approved, so it will be interesting to see if your mail works
over there.
Just looked into a group that I’m supposed to be a moderator of in Yahoogroups,
it’s still a mess over there. Yahoo groups that is. Well the group itself
isn’t in the greatest shape either, but it hasn’t been for a long time *lol*.
> On Mar 17, 2015, at 7:23 AM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I’m not in any rush. I just wanted to let you know since I had said I would
> get subscribed sometime last night. I had remembered you saying that you do
> not get notified.
>
> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 7:41 AM
> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Response to Tom's Audio Letter
>
> Okay, haven’t been over there yet, obviously it doesn’t notify via e-mail,
> that is a big knock against it. Am checking out some other places today too.
> Cubic.org <http://cubic.org/> etc. E-lists too, although I’m not sure about
> administrative controls in that server too, looks like just anybody could
> roam in there. Cubic at least lets you quarantine first message to see if
> someone is legit first. Will probably still keep exploring, somewhere there
> has to be a place that is a happy balance. Haven’t been to yahoo groups for
> several months, and I still have a group over there, maybe I should go over
> there and see if anything has changed to the better. Probably not though
> because I keep seeing groups moving.
>
>> On Mar 17, 2015, at 6:33 AM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> I sent a request to subscribe this morning.
>>
>> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan
>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:45 PM
>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Response to Tom's Audio Letter
>>
>> Actually it’s the other way around, groups that get mail from gmail the
>> originator will not see their post, especially with yahoo groups, not sure
>> about google groups though. Just tested using GMX accounts and saw what I
>> posted. There are some other accessibility problems that are being ran into
>> though, so not sure yet how viable of an option it actually would be. Might
>> have to explore farther afield, and we may not find a place that doesn’t
>> have these kinds of limits.
>>
>> Yeah over at missives it was really bad for BethAnn, she was cut out of the
>> loop entirely. IT was a little dicy with frilliest too, but it seemed to
>> work better faster, although it still redacts her mail.
>>
>> Well it’s open for experimentation for now, but so far mixed results.
>>
>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I had said I do not see any reason to not go ahead and try the other group
>>> through Google. The only concerns I had were the fact that it took a while
>>> for Bethann to see my mail and I to see her mail when we first changed.
>>> Even after we got it straightened out some what there for a while Bethann
>>> still was not seeing a lot of my mail unless someone else responded to it
>>> first. I do not know why that it was like that. I think I am going to have
>>> to get use to not seeing my own mail, I have heard that if you are on a
>>> Google group then When you send mail you do not see your own unless you
>>> follow specific steps to enable that. Other than the concern that we will
>>> start having problems like we have in previous moves everything else seems
>>> like a positive thing to bring the group back to one group instead of their
>>> being a divide in the group.
>>>
>>>
>>> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan
>>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 1:37 AM
>>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Response to Tom's Audio Letter
>>>
>>> I don’t think so, no to this point in the timeline at least.
>>> Am reading mail from oldest to newest, or for Danny’s benefit eldest to
>>> most youngerly.
>>>
>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 8:32 PM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey I did not see my response come through, did it come through?
Other related posts:
