Well first she has to come back into audio-pals land. Text her and ask her if her ears are burning today? Or at least ringing a lot since she’s being talked about well written about anyway. > On Mar 13, 2015, at 10:37 AM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This will definitely be interesting… Tom vs. Amanda *LOL*. How much are the > tickets? > > From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of BethAnn LaPresta > (Redacted sender "bela28_02@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bela28_02@xxxxxxxxx>" for DMARC) > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 11:15 AM > To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses > > Cue Rocky music here folks...maybe I'll be the one selling the tickets this > time there Joshie! > > From: Thomas McMahan <shadowmonstrosity@xxxxxxx > <mailto:shadowmonstrosity@xxxxxxx>> > To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 8:01 AM > Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses > > Go for it. > > I still keep original copies, it will be interesting to see what she says. > She actually may agree with it. Or maybe not. > > > >> On Mar 13, 2015, at 9:00 AM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> >> I’m going to have to tell Amanda you called her salty *LOL*. >> >> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan >> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 9:18 AM >> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses >> >> I think a garage is for storing your car away whether you get wet in the >> process of getting inside or not. They are very handy up here whether >> attached or detached. We have neither, it’s hard on a car sitting outside >> all winter up here, shortens battery life at least, not good for the belts >> either. >> >> Maybe Danny will let you park the car in his tree, but maybe then again you >> won’t like to do that because he might drive it around and thats kind of >> scary. >> >> At this point i would consider all options attached is best but if the place >> is good enough a little rain once in a while on you won’t melt you. Maybe >> Amanda but not you, salt just lumps up with a little water thats all *lol*. >> On Mar 13, 2015, at 7:40 AM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> >>> Talking about a detached garage, Amanda had a couple of houses on her list >>> that were detached garages, but I ruled them out before ever going to them. >>> I think a detached garage is useless. The main reason I would want a garage >>> in the first place is to stay out of the elements when they are bad and if >>> I had a detached garage well then I am still going outside at some point in >>> order to get in the house. Now, that the criteria has changed and shifted a >>> bit so that we have more options though it may be that we reconsider >>> detached garages at some point. After all we are now considering houses >>> with carports whereas before we were not. >>> >>> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan >>> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 2:37 PM >>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses >>> >>> No he couldn’t, we he won’t once the property tax comes around. Not in >>> Chicago. Detroit maybe though. >>> >>>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 1:19 PM, BethAnn LaPresta (Redacted sender >>>> "bela28_02@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bela28_02@xxxxxxxxx>" for DMARC) >>>> <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Actually for $120K, he could probably buy an entire block in Chicago... >>>> >>>> From: Thomas McMahan <thomas.mcmahan@xxxxxxx >>>> <mailto:thomas.mcmahan@xxxxxxx>> >>>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 11:08 AM >>>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses >>>> >>>> Why didn’t you tell us you lived in Chicago? Sounds very much the same as >>>> it is up there. >>>> >>>> Hey Josh, I just thought of another option. There are lots of houses >>>> available in Detroit. Heck you can probably buy yourself a school >>>> building there. That would be a big house for you. Utilities might be a >>>> little high though. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 11:57 AM, BethAnn LaPresta (Redacted sender >>>>> "bela28_02@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bela28_02@xxxxxxxxx>" for DMARC) >>>>> <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> My house is in a neighborhood that is definitely considered "the hood". >>>>> I refinanced in January at $130K and my payment is about $800/mo. My >>>>> property taxes are spendy though, over $2K per year, so that adds almost >>>>> $200/mo right there. They tossed 26 of my cottage style single detached >>>>> homes on little 3900 sq ft. lots, so our cul-de-sac is very busy with all >>>>> of us stacked up right against each other. But, living out west, things >>>>> cost much more, it is shocking actually. >>>>> >>>>> I could've purchased a 100 yr. old home where Heather lives in Ohio with >>>>> about the same size lot for $60K, just to give perspective. The guy who >>>>> got himself into trouble with my house paid $263K for it in 2006 when >>>>> real estate prices were obscene out here. Because he was short selling >>>>> the home, I was able to get it for just $110K in 2011. A house on my >>>>> street has just gone up for sale and they're asking $200K for 3 bedrooms >>>>> (and they are tiny), 2 baths with one car detached garage. So, if I need >>>>> to sell, I should still be able to make a little. >>>>> >>>>> Thought I should explain my monthly payment since I was saying I didn't >>>>> think the $600/mo. seemed like enough. >>>>> >>>>> From: Thomas McMahan <shadowmonstrosity@xxxxxxx >>>>> <mailto:shadowmonstrosity@xxxxxxx>> >>>>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 9:23 AM >>>>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses >>>>> >>>>> Oh mine btw was $162, because we’re cheap! *lol*. Then it went down to >>>>> $150 then down to $128, but again we’re cheap and live in a piece of s— >>>>> house, but as Pat used to say, “it’s our piece of S— *lol*. >>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 10:12 AM, BethAnn LaPresta (Redacted sender >>>>>> "bela28_02@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bela28_02@xxxxxxxxx>" for DMARC) >>>>>> <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I am not sure that $600/month figure is accurate. I just refinanced at >>>>>> 3.25% and my payment is $800/mo. (this does include property taxes and >>>>>> insurance though). >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> >>>>>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 4:44 AM >>>>>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses >>>>>> >>>>>> Amanda did some figuring using a mortgage calculator online and the >>>>>> 120,000 house was going to run us roughly 600 something a month for I >>>>>> want to again say it was 1700 sq. ft. We currently live in a 1100 sq. >>>>>> ft. apartment and pay 714.00 a month. So, given the differences there >>>>>> and the fact that we have nothing to show for it at the end of the year >>>>>> is a little much in my book. So, if the 120,000 was going to be 600 >>>>>> something it would go to reason that the 112,000 would be less money >>>>>> than that. Now, as far as utilities go, Knoxville Utilitiy Board (KUB) >>>>>> will give us high and low figures for the last 12 months. The last 12 >>>>>> months is a good thing providing there has been someone living in the >>>>>> house, but if the house has sat empty then the numbers that KUB quotes >>>>>> are not in the least bit accurate. I really like the idea of rolling >>>>>> insurance and taxes into the monthly payment so that way at the end of >>>>>> the year or whenever land taxes are due we are not hit with a big lump >>>>>> sum of money to pay. Sure it would be nice to think that I could just >>>>>> put that money back each month and not touch it, but the minute >>>>>> something needs to be paid for guess where the land tax money goes that >>>>>> was being put bac into an account. If it is figured into the monthly >>>>>> payment then for the most part the majority of it will be paid >>>>>> throughout the year. The thing that really sucks is that stinking PMI >>>>>> payment each month. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 4:58 AM >>>>>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses >>>>>> >>>>>> I accidentally hit the send before cleaning up that mail darn it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here’s another little exercise to work on. Lets say you guys decide to >>>>>> go for this house. You should have a ballpark of the monthly payment. >>>>>> Sit down and plot out a budget around it on one paper, as well as a list >>>>>> of possible repairs to do on another list and their costs. Yes a house >>>>>> payment can be cheaper than rent, but their are other realities such as >>>>>> the taxes, and insurance. Are you going to escrow your insuranc and tax >>>>>> payments into your house payment? Most people do that and it usually >>>>>> works out well until they assess your house taxes up and then you have >>>>>> to make up the short fall. Of course if they assess them downward you >>>>>> get a chunk of money back in the mail like my sister-in-law has done the >>>>>> past two years. I didn’t escro my other payments. I deal with >>>>>> insurance as I would any other utility, and we would do our taxes on our >>>>>> own. Because of that I now pay my insurance once a year and it’s >>>>>> cheaper, and once the house was paid for there was less entanglement >>>>>> with the bank. I even removed the automatic withdraw for house payment >>>>>> because they double dipped us a couple of different months, and didn’t >>>>>> have a very good explanation as to why. So it put us into over draw >>>>>> land, which isn’t a place you want to be. They did the same to my >>>>>> sis-in-law too and she went in and practically threw a fit because she >>>>>> wasn’t working at the time and didn’t have income yet. They refunded >>>>>> her money on that one, but as she asked them, “now how am I supposed to >>>>>> pay the rest of my bills? You think you guys are my only bill to pay?” >>>>>> Banks and their computers can be sloppy sometimes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now when you do your budget here’s another game to play which may be >>>>>> beneficial. Can you run your whole budget on one income? Everybody >>>>>> that lives as a couple should do this whether renting or paying for a >>>>>> house. Most of us find we can’t, but it is a nice goal. The guy we had >>>>>> going along with us to check out houses etc and sort of pointed and >>>>>> guided us along through the process gave us that little bit of wisdom. >>>>>> As he said, what happens if Pat loses her job and can’t get one very >>>>>> fast? Can you live on just your income alone, because if you can get to >>>>>> that point, then you can start paying extra against your house on it’s >>>>>> principle and have more paid off faster which is good for the credit >>>>>> rating, but if you decide to move in 20 years you are carrying less of a >>>>>> load thus will get more money back to leverage against your next place >>>>>> should you decide to do that. Or you can both pay some extra on house >>>>>> and car, then put the rest in the bank against major repairs which are >>>>>> going to come even if you buy a house that was built today, in 30 years >>>>>> you will have to had to replace things, they just don’t build stuff that >>>>>> good anymore and sometimes that includes homes btw. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lots of decisions, but at least it looks like you guys aren’t just >>>>>> jumping right and grabbing what shines in front of you which is good. >>>>>> >>>>>> Btw, I don’t think our budget is currently within the lowest income >>>>>> level of the house here at this time which would be Patti’s income, >>>>>> although it’s not way above that amount. It is a good goal to work for >>>>>> actually, so we will be able to start seriously working on this place. >>>>>> Get a lot of little stuff done over time, then do a loan down the road >>>>>> and fix the major stuff such as re doing the roof etc. I don’t think I >>>>>> am going to lift the house and work on foundation, but it would be nice >>>>>> to do actually. >>>>>> >>>>>> But it’s a good exercise to do. I would run it on your income Josh >>>>>> because it is likely to always be there and Amanda’s income is the >>>>>> variable one, it can be lower if she’s out of work, but can also be a >>>>>> lot higher should land a great paying job. Drop in everything, credit >>>>>> cards the whole deal, then figure out once you get to where you’re going >>>>>> which angles to cover and get paid off in the budget. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am guessing you guys have done some of this already though in >>>>>> preparing for checking out the housing market and talking to lenders >>>>>> because they are going to do roughly the same thing when checking your >>>>>> credit etc. Especially if it’s a conservative bank. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now I think I’ve completed all I was going to say. Took two e-mails, >>>>>> but if I had been able to clean up the other one first it would have >>>>>> fitted into one probably *lol*. >>>>>> >>>>>> Instead you get two. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 3:34 AM, Thomas McMahan <shadowmonstrosity@xxxxxxx >>>>>>> <mailto:shadowmonstrosity@xxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wouldn’t worry about a house on market for 5 months. Most around here >>>>>>> are on a year or so. To many deals fall through each time that happens >>>>>>> that just adds more time that the house is sitting there. Age, is only >>>>>>> a problem if the house hasn’t been kept up and modernized over the >>>>>>> years. There are people who prefer older houses simply because they >>>>>>> are more solid. The house I live in was placed here in 1922. Yes it >>>>>>> came from somewhere else. The house next door is older and was also >>>>>>> brought in here from another place too. Fairly common in a town that >>>>>>> springs up by a railroad. I wouldn’t worry so much about that as >>>>>>> apposed to how it’s fundamentally built, there are a lot of newer >>>>>>> places that are likely to give you just as much trouble if not more. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any house is going to have ongoing mantainence of some kind. Sided >>>>>>> house are nice but siding fades over the years for example and >>>>>>> eventually would need replacing. Wooden houses have their things that >>>>>>> have to be done, and so would brick, but brick is the best option as >>>>>>> far as I’m concerned accept maybe when a big earthquake comes, then I >>>>>>> would favor a wooden house, but what are the chances of that huh? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don’t know the market down there anymore so don’t know if that is a >>>>>>> low ball figure on that house or not, but I can tell you it is larger >>>>>>> than mine is and mine is two stories, but so is it’s price too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Go through it with a fine tooth comb with the idea of what has to be >>>>>>> fixed now, and then in the next 5 years and what would be ongoing over >>>>>>> the years, I don’t think for the long term ongoing it will be much >>>>>>> different than a 10 year old house verses the 60 year old house, but >>>>>>> agin it is a matter of what would immediately have to be worked on. >>>>>>> When was the house last occupied too? A house that hasn’t been >>>>>>> occupied for a good while can have problems such as drainage because >>>>>>> they haven’t been flushed etc. It sounds like you already have someone >>>>>>> with you who knows how to examine a foundation well and give you an >>>>>>> idea of what would have to be done and when which is good. Same with >>>>>>> tuck pointing brick etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It may be sitting on market because folks think it’s to high also, but >>>>>>> you are going to drop in a price and they will take it or leave it, or >>>>>>> you both the buyer and seller will eventually come up with something in >>>>>>> the middle, or the seller is going to have an empty house on their >>>>>>> hands. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What heating and cooling does it have, and when was it installed too >>>>>>> that is a factor, a 30 year old furnace is getting kind of old in this >>>>>>> part of the world, but most of our furnaces are gas and they do have to >>>>>>> work pretty hard for a good part of the year. Does it have any >>>>>>> chimnies, and where do they run through the house. Ones that run >>>>>>> through centers of houses on the surface are nice, but when they have >>>>>>> to be worked on they are a lot more work. Of course where you live a >>>>>>> lot of homes are electric heat and electric water heat, which is >>>>>>> another thing to add to your check list, how old is the water heater >>>>>>> and when will you be replacing that. A brand new house obviously you >>>>>>> would get to wait a while before doing that, but chances are you would >>>>>>> have to do it eventually, or have your price knocked down when you are >>>>>>> selling it, or when your descendants are selling it. But that goes >>>>>>> with any house again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What neighborhood is it in? How accessible is it to you. Pretend >>>>>>> Amanda had to leave town for a Month and start your math, what is easy >>>>>>> to get to via walking etc. Maybe that isn’t a problem for you at this >>>>>>> moment, but life can always hand you changes, and well, next thing you >>>>>>> know, you are walking to the grocery store if you know what I mean. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Find out what their highest bills were for each utility in the last >>>>>>> year it was occupied if you can, you need that in planning a general >>>>>>> budget. I don’t know your property tax situation anymore, but here >>>>>>> they just give an estimate from the seller, but the problem is, that if >>>>>>> the sell lived in the house for a long time you might get a little >>>>>>> surprise when the annual taxes come. Our’s wasn’t a surprise because >>>>>>> the previous owner hadn’t lived or owned the house for to long. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So it becomes also a matter of do you get a house that you won’t have >>>>>>> to do any work or as little work as possible on, verses one that may >>>>>>> have to have some work done, or one that is a fixer upper. We bought a >>>>>>> fixer upper, but when we bought it was a seller’s market, it definitely >>>>>>> isn’t that nowadays, so we went for a house we knew we could likely >>>>>>> get. Well the trade off is that it’s needed work done on it and still >>>>>>> does actually, but likely we would at least get some money back when we >>>>>>> sell it. Maybe not a lot but probably some when all is said and done, >>>>>>> and of course the sell of this place could be the lverage to getting a >>>>>>> better place. It’s probably what you parents did, if not them then >>>>>>> your grand parents did, that is more the normal thing in history. Well >>>>>>> up until recently where you have people who expect to buy a brand new >>>>>>> house that is larger than what their parents owned as their first >>>>>>> house. Well if it can be swung, go for it, but to me it’s a little >>>>>>> unrealistic, well to my income level it is *lol*. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What appliances are already there, and how quickly do you think you >>>>>>> will be having to replace say: stove, washer, or more of a bear >>>>>>> dishwasher? What about cabinetry etc, is Amanda happy with that, >>>>>>> having that done can also be expensive unless you have someone who >>>>>>> works with you to give you a break. How much stuff will you guys do on >>>>>>> your own for modifications verses having to hire outsiders. So yes the >>>>>>> advantage of a new place is that you won’t have to do that, but I >>>>>>> guarantee you will pay up front for that, but that is why newer houses >>>>>>> don’t stay on market long. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So then it falls back to degree of work and mantainence that has to be >>>>>>> done. >>>>>>>> On Mar 11, 2015, at 9:41 PM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> We are finding tons of older houses that we absolutely love. When I >>>>>>>> say older I am talking 1950’s. I am struggling with this a bit though >>>>>>>> because I am looking ahead, past when I am living there. Or rather to >>>>>>>> the point that I am ready to not live there anymore. So, when I get to >>>>>>>> the point of not wanting to live there anymore it could be 10, 20, 30 >>>>>>>> or more years down the road, but I am sure there will come a time that >>>>>>>> I am ready to move on. If this is not the case and I stay there until >>>>>>>> I die then it is not a concern, However, a 1950 house that I live in >>>>>>>> for 20 years will then be 85 years old. I know the specific house that >>>>>>>> we are looking at has been on the market for right about 5 months. So, >>>>>>>> what do you all think, do you think I would have trouble selling an 85 >>>>>>>> year old home? It is on the market for 5 months at the age of 65 years >>>>>>>> old. It is right about 112,000.00 right now without negotiating a >>>>>>>> lower price. Do you think I would be able to get my money back? If it >>>>>>>> is not a major concern, the age of the house, then I will not let it >>>>>>>> sway my decision, but taking into consideration that it is an all >>>>>>>> brick rancher with over 1700 sq. ft. and it is almost 100,000.00 and >>>>>>>> still on the market concerns me regardless how beautiful the house >>>>>>>> seems right now. > > > >